Epstein Secrets

Avenue Denver, Colorado 80203 PH 303.831.7364 HI 303.832.2628 www.hmllaw.com [email protected] Re: Reconsideration of the Court's July 23 Ruling Giuffie v. Ghislaine Maxwell, No. 15 Civ. 7433 (LAP) Dear Judge Preska: As counsel for Ms. Maxwell we write to request that the Court vindicate its Protect

baby: Virginia Roberts March 22.2020 I 3:24pm Virginia Roberts Giuffre wham Farrington Former teen "sex slave" when t

18/20 EFTA00075105 Cas63sE 941143 VI/0Rn @Want rtit7100V2 CFM2ft 057233/2 G g gatjef tv 013161 Epstein, Maxwell wanted me to have surrogate baby: Virginia Roberts March 22.2020 I 3:24pm Virginia Roberts Giuffre wham Farrington Former teen "sex slave" when they asked her, at g , pear mew sur MUM

it7100V2 CFM2ft 057233/2 G g gatjef tv 013161 Epstein, Maxwell wanted me to have surrogate baby: Virginia Roberts March 22.2020 I 3:24pm Virginia Roberts Giuffre wham Farrington Former teen "sex slave" when they asked her, at g , pear mew sur MUM says she finally fled Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwe

k for Epstein can be found in excerpts -- unsealed by a federal court last year -- of two 2016 depositions related to a defamation lawsuit filed by Virginia Giuffre. one of Epstein's alleged victims, who has accused Maxwell of recruiting her into Epstein's alleged child trafficking scheme, an accusation Maxwell

baby: Virginia Roberts March 22.2020 I 3:24pm Virginia Roberts Giuffre wham Farrington Former teen "sex slave"

in deciding whether to unseal materials it was important to give weight to the impact on a criminal defendant's right to a fair trial. In Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc., 435 U.S. 589 (1978), a number of media moved the district court to release audio tapes admitted into evidence in the trial of four of Preside

Avenue Denver, Colorado 80203 PH 303.831.7364 HI 303.832.2628 www.hmtlaw.com [email protected] Re: Reconsideration of the Court's July 23 Ruling Giuffie v. Ghislaine Maxwell, No. 15 Civ. 7433 (LAP) Dear Judge Preska: As counsel for Ms. Maxwell we write to request that the Court vindicate its Protect

in deciding whether to unseal materials it was important to give weight to the impact on a criminal defendant's right to a fair trial. In Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc., 435 U.S. 589 (1978), a number of media moved the district court to release audio tapes admitted into evidence in the trial of four of Preside

omplaint against Jeffrey Epstein, as follows: Parties, Jurisdiction and Venue 1. Jane Doe No. 2 is a citizen and resident of th e Commonwealth of Virginia, and is sui juris. 2. This Complaint is brought under a fictitious name to protect the identity of the Plaintiff because this Complaint makes sen

.R. 5.4(A). It is well settled that the media and the public in general possess a common-law right to inspect and copy judicial records. See Nixon ! Warner Communications, Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 (1978). "The right to inspect and copy records is not absolute, however. As with other forms of access, it may interfere w