Epstein Secrets

alifornia San Jose Del Cabo, Mexico Citation CJ2 7/4/2015 Los Angeles, California British Columbia, Canada Challenger 300 6/20/2015 Manassas, Virginia Ontario, Canada Falcon 9006 7/6/2015 Manassas, Virginia Ocala, Florida Falcon 50 6/18/2015 7/3/2015 7/2/2015 Martha's Vineyard, Massachuse

ad, California Las Vegas, Nevada Beechjet 400A EFTA00685975 7/4/2015 Charleston, South Carolina Brunswick, Georgia Challenger 601 6/29/2015 Cheyenne, Wyoming Denver, Colorado Citation Ultra 6/28/2015 Chicago (wheeling), Illinois Eagle River, Wisconsin King Air 350 7/11/2015 Cleveland, Ohio

736-KAM Document 77 Entered on FLSD Docket 05/02/2011 Page 10 of 29 attach after an indictment. The U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia has agreed with the Fifth Circuit's ruling in Dean: "Mite Fifth Circuit has noted that victims acquire rights under the CVRA even before prosecutio

government is no longer confidential — and therefore no longer protected by the work-product doctrine. See Grace United Methodist Church v. City of Cheyenne, 451 F.3d 643, 668 (10th Cir. 2005) ("any work product objection was waived by [party] via production" of the documents in question). Because no con

involv- ing section 2255. In Smith v. Husband, 376 F.Supp2d 603, 613 (E.D.Va.2005), the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, held, after analyzing the legisla- tive history of section 2255 to determine Congress' intent, that a criminal conviction under one of the listed

pp. P. 34(aX2); 10th Cir. It 34.1(G). The case is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument. Guy P. Cleveland, Cleveland Law Office, Cheyenne, Wyoming, for Plaintiff-Appellant. Mary Elizabeth Galvan, Laramie, Wyoming, for Defendant-Appellee. Before KELLY, LUCERO, and HARTZ, Circuit Judg