Epstein Secrets

S RESPONSE: (b) 2. (a) The government admits that, after Epstein's attorneys learned of the notification that the government planned to provide to Jane Doe #2, who claimed that she was not a victim, Epstein's attorneys contacted the USAO and objected to the procedures for notification and the legal bases

ness address. However, I did not have any direct way of contradicting sworn statement. Since then, however, in answering the victims' Requests for Admissions, the Government has admitted that it possesses information that learned confidential, non-public information about the Epstein case and that he di

S RESPONSE: (b) 2. (a) The government admits that, after Epstein's attorneys learned of the notification that the government planned to provide to Jane Doe #2, who claimed that she was not a victim, Epstein's attorneys contacted the USAO and objected to the procedures for notification and the legal bases

iness address. However, I did not have any direct ■ of contradicting sworn statement. Since then, however, in answering the victims' Requests for Admissions, the Government has admitted that it possesses information that learned confidential, non-public information about the Epstein case and that he di

ere it would have been possible to have sex with Jane Doe #3."). In media statements, Dershowitz has repeatedl

ted that it possessed information contradicting Reinhart's sworn affidavit. See DE 225.1 at 9-10, ¶¶ 43-45 ("in answering the victims' Requests for Admissions, the Government has admitted that it possess information that Reinhart leamed confidential non-public information about the Epstein case and he disc

S RESPONSE: (b) 2. (a) The government admits that, after Epstein's attorneys learned of the notification that the government planned to provide to Jane Doe #2, who claimed that she was not a victim, Epstein's attorneys contacted the USAO and objected to the procedures for notification and the legal bases

ss. However, I did not have any direct way of contradicting Reinhart's sworn statement. Since then, however, in answering the victims' Requests for Admissions, the Government has admitted that it possesses information that Reinhart learned confidential, non-public information about the Epstein case and th

nt's MOTION to Compel Independent Medical Exam of Jane Doe #3 Pursuant to Rule 35 by Jeffrey Epstein. Response

ciated Cases: 9:08-cv-80119-KAM et al.(Edwards, Bradley) (Entered: 07/10/2009) 195 Plaintiff's MOTION to Compel Response to Plaintiff's Request for Admissions by Jane Doe. Responses due by 7/27/2009 Associated Cases: 9:08-cv-80119-KAM et al.(Edwards, Bradley) (Entered: 07/10/2009) 196 Plaintiff's MOTION

Entered on FLSD Docket 12/30/2014 Page 10 of 13 Jane Doe #3's and Jane Doe #4's participation is also directl

itted that it possessed information contradicting Reinhart's sworn affidavit. See DE 225-I at 9-10, 43-45 ("in answering the victims' Requests for Admissions, the Government has admitted that it possess information that Reinhart learned confidential non-public information about the Epstein case and he dis

U-Shanghai), and Duke University (Duke-Kunshan)—have gone so far as to establish campuses in China, while others have opened centers (e.g., Stanford, Virginia, Chicago, Yale, Harvard, Columbia). Many more American universities have forged collaborative exchange programs with Chinese counterparts. While US-

higher education for the period 2011-2017 accessible at https://studentaid.ed.gov/sa/about/data-center/school/foreign-gifts, accessed 2018.07.17. 27 Admissions officers at leading universities say this is an increasingly common practice. 28 “China Studies Program.” Hanban. english.hanban.org/node_43075.htm.

nt's MOTION to Compel Independent Medical Exam of Jane Doe #3 Pursuant to Rule 35 by Jeffrey Epstein. Response

Associated Cases: 9:08-cv-80119-KAM et al.(Edwards, Bradley) (Entered: 07/10/2009) Plaintiff's MOTION to Compel Response to Plaintiff's Request for Admissions by Jane Doe. Responses due by 7/27/2009 Associated Cases: 9:08-cv-80119-KAM et al.(Edwards, Bradley) (Entered: 07/10/2009) Plaintiff's MOTION to Co