Epstein Secrets

en agreement? A. Well, there have been addenda to the agreement, if I recall correctly, but sitting here today, the parties to the agreement include Virginia Roberts, and her -- well, attorneys representing -- I ROUGH DRAFT ONLY HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021862 Oo O DN OO FF WwW NY =| NO RO PO PNP NM NO | S| S| HS SF S|

I'm putting aside her attorneys. MR. SCAROLA: Attorneys. MR. SIMPSON: Attorneys. MR. SCAROLA: Attorneys. MR. SIMPSON: Yes. MR. SCAROLA: Not just Virginia Roberts' attorneys, but any attorney sharing a common interest privilege? MR. SIMPSON: No. No. MR. SCAROLA: Okay. Well I'm not going to let him -- BY MR. S

ofessor Dershowitz engaged in this sexual misconduct with Miss Roberts; she's Jane Doe Number 3, correct? A. That's right. Jane Doe Number 3 is Miss Virginia Roberts Goufrey * (ph). Q. And I will ask you questions about that. But my question now is: You also allege that Professor Dershowitz was a participant in the abuse

| NO RO PO PNP NM NO | S| S| HS SF S| S| S| S| S| non BP WO NO -|- ODO OO WDN OO OT BP WO NYO — 28 A. Correct. Q. And focusing now, not -- not on Virginia Roberts, we are focusing on the other minors, correct? I just have that in mind, right? A. I'm sorry. Could you repeat the question? Q. I want to m

BY MR. SIMPSON: Q. Let me identify that for the record. I may want to mark two things. A. Okay. Q. Exhibit 1 is documented Plaintiff's Response to Motion for Limited Intervention by Alan M. Dershowitz, and I'm going to ask the reporter to mark another exhibit at the same time. This will be Exhibit 2, and this is a document ent

llow the Fifth Circuit's holding in Dean (and the view of the U.S. District Courts for the Eastern District of New York and the Eastern District of Virginia) and conclude that the CVRA extends rights to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 under the facts of this case. C. The U.S. Attorney's Office Has Previous

ust a few days ago your Office did not oppose a motion to intervene in the case by Alan Dershowitz. See DE 294 ("The Government does not oppose the Motion for Limited Intervention by Alan M. Dershowitz."). If your Office is not going to oppose a motion by a suspected co-conspirator of Epstein's to intervene in the case, we tr

ESPONSE in Opposition re 280 Motion to Adopt/Join Jane Doe #3 and Jane Doe #4 filed by United States of Americ

247 Motion for Protective Confidentiality Order. Signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on 9/21/2014. (ir) (Entered: 09/22/2014) 256 ORDER granting 215 Motion for Limited Intervention. Signed by Judge Kenneth A. Marra on 9/21/2014. (ir) (Entered: 09/22/2014) 257 ORDER granting 218 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages; granting

ere it would have been possible to have sex with Jane Doe #3."). In media statements, Dershowitz has repeatedl

g "targeted" precisely because his involvement in Epstein's sexual trafficking would help "blow up" the plea agreement: 13 In his Supplement to his Motion for Limited Intervention, Dershowitz claims that only infonnation relevant to this case is information known by the Government before September 24, 2007 — the latest date o

the Government's alleged failure to confer with Jane Doe #3 before entering the NPA could not rationally be

T TO HIS MOTION FOR LIMITED INTERVENTION (DE 282) Alan M. Dershowitz, a nonparty to this litigation, respectfully supplements his previously filed Motion for Limited Intervention (DE 282), as follows': The rights afforded by the Crime Victims' Rights Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3771(a)(5) (hereinafter the "CVRA"), including the right t

s were "redundant, immaterial, impertinent, or scandalous." See Doe v. United States, 08-cv-80736 (S.D.Fla.), DE 324 at 4. Ex. F. Specifically as to Jane Doe 3, Judge Marra found her allegations of being "sexually trafficked to several high-profile non-party individuals" to be "lurid" and "unnecessary" to

it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: the Rule 21 Motion (DE 280) is DENIED; the Rule 15 Motion (DE 311) is DENIED; Intervenor Dershowitz's Motion for Limited Intervention (DE 282) and Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Reply in Support of Motion for Limited Intervention (DE 317) are DENIED AS MOOT; Petitioners' Mo

STRICKEN from the record: • DE 279, in its entirety. DE 280, all sentences between the following sentences: "The Government then concealed from Jane Doc #3 the existence of its NPA from Jane Doe #3, in violation of her rights under the CVRA" (DE 280 at 3)- and "The Government was well aware of Jane Do

it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: the Rule 21 Motion (DE 280) is DENIED; the Rule 15 Motion (DE 311) is DENIED; Intervenor Dershowitz's Motion for Limited Intervention (DE 282) and Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Reply in Support of Motion for Limited Intervention (DE 317) are DENIED AS MOOT; Petitioners' Mo

Entered on FLSD Docket 12/30/2014 Page 10 of 13 Jane Doe #3's and Jane Doe #4's participation is also directl

g "targeted" precisely because his involvement in Epstein's sexual trafficking would help "blow up" the plea agreement: 13 In his Supplement to his Motion for Limited Intervention, Dershowitz claims that only information relevant to this case is information known by the Government before September 24, 2007 — the latest date o