Epstein Secrets

ughes, 633 F.2d 282 (3d Cir. 1980) 2 Carpenter v. United States, 138 S. Ct. 2206 (2018). 2, 3 Doe v. Indyke, Case No., 20-cv-00484 (S.D.N.Y.) 6 Giuffre v. Maxwell, 325 F. Supp. 3d 428 (S.D.N.Y. 2018) 6 Matter of Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated Feb. 18, 1988, 685 F. Supp. 49 (S.D.N.Y. 1988)

material is in the possession of a third- party, a defendant has standing to challenge a grand jury subpoena of that material. Matter of Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum Dated Feb. 18, 1988, 685 F. Supp. 49, 51 (S.D.N.Y. 1988) (law firm could intervene and join motion to quash grand jury subpoena issued to private 1

ru P-009271 File folder entitled "[Victim name]/Jane Doe #3" containing meta-analysis of all phone, travel,

documents that "might allow them to protect those very rights." (lcl at 15). By way of illustration, Petitioners offer the case of In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum, where the Eighth Circuit broadly stated that "the general duty of public service calls upon government employees and agencies to favor disclosure

nt's MOTION to Compel Independent Medical Exam of Jane Doe #3 Pursuant to Rule 35 by Jeffrey Epstein. Response

Exhibit A)(Horowitz, Adam) (Entered: 12/21/2009) 443 RESPONSE/REPLY to 442 Response to Motion to Compel Presidential Women's Center to Comply with Subpoena Duces Tecum and Incorporated Motion to Compel Presidential Women's Center to Comply with Subpoena Duces Tecum Regarding Jane Doe 4 by Jeffrey Epstein. (Attachm

STATES RESPONSE: 2. (a) The government admits that, after Epstein's attorneys learned of the notification that the government planned to provide to Jane Doe #2, who claimed that she was not a victim, Epstein's attorneys contacted the USAO and objected to the procedures for notification and the legal bases

tionships" and that "[t]his principle has been applied to fiduciary relationships beyond the traditional trust context"); see also In re Grand Jury Subpoena Duces Tecum, 112 F.3d 910, 919-21 (8th Cir. 1997) (government attorneys have duty to report wrongdoing). Communications Facilitating Crime-Fraud-Misconduct Not

nt's MOTION to Compel Independent Medical Exam of Jane Doe #3 Pursuant to Rule 35 by Jeffrey Epstein. Response

orowitz, Adam) (Entered: 12/21/2009) 12/29/2009 443 RESPONSE/REPLY to 442 Response to Motion to Compel Presidential Women's Center to Comply with Subpoena Duces Tecum and Incorporated Motion to Compel Presidential Women's Center to Comply with Subpoena Duces Tecum Regarding Jane Doe 4 by Jeffrey Epstein. (Attachme