Epstein Secrets

d acted in any way inappropriately with regard to Virginia [Giuffre], that I ever touched her, that I ever met her, t

al abuse Allegations. Rather, these records are an important part of this case, since they not only support the conclusion that Dershowitz abused Ms. Giuffre, but also indisputably establish Edwards and Cassell’s strong basis for filing the allegations on her behalf. Moreover, contrary to assertions made i

uded that “at this juncture in the proceedings” details about the sexual abuse she had suffered was unnecessary to making a determination “of whether Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4 should be permitted to join [the other victims’] claim that the Government violated their rights under the CVRA. The factual details r

at question. I am aware that never before 2014, end of December, was it ever, ever alleged that I had acted in any way inappropriately with regard to Virginia [Giuffre], that I ever touched her, that I ever met her, that Ihad ever been with her. I was completely aware ofthat. There had never been any allega

body had taken the photograph. Given the surrounding circumstances, I thought perhaps Mr. Epstein had taken the photograph. So that would have shown Virginia Roberts's sexual abuse was not confined just to Florida, not confined to the New York mansion; it would have -- it would have presumably continued into London

owerful individual that Epstein forced then-minor Jane Doe #3 to have sexual relations with was former Harvard

aware that never, until the lies were put in a legal pleading at the end of December 2014, it was never alleged that I had any sexual contact with Virginia Roberts. I know that it was alleged that I was a 11:38:46 witness to Jeffrey Epstein's alleged abuse and that was false. I was never a witness to any of

tiality of Court Records Page 20 of 20 COUNSEL LIST Sigrid Stone McCawley, Esquire [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected] Boies Schiller & Flexner, LLP 401 E Las Olas Boulevard., Suite 1200 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-356-0011 Attorneys for Alan M.Dershowitz, Esquire Thomas Emers

y any eatin gi vehenkmningene mi 0 97 500166! GIUFFRE HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014223 EXHBIT 3 HOUSE_OVERSIGH

NEW YORK CASE NO. 15-CV-07433-RWS a ep ee ep x VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, Plaintiff, Vv. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. ee

Had she ever been to Thailand before? 23 talked to Jeffrey after that was mainly the 1 23 A Not that I was aware of. 24 conversations are, "Where is Virginia? Iknow you: 24 Q Did he know whether she had just jeft 25 know where she's at." 25 Thailand without a word? Page 5g! Page 60 1 I'm, like, "No, dude

XHIBIT 6 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_014286 Page 1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CASE NO. 15-CV-07433-RWS a ep ee ep x VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, Plaintiff, Vv. GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. ee re ee 7 x May 18, 2016 9:04 a.m. CONFIDENTIAL Deposition of Po pursuant 4 to notice, taken by P

XWELL, Defendant. ee re ee 7 x May 18, 2016 9:04 a.m. CONFIDENTIAL Deposition of Po pursuant 4 to notice, taken by Plaintiff, at the offices of Boies Schiller & Flexner, 401 Las Olas Boulevard, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, before Kelli Ann Willis, a Registered Professional Reporter, Certified Realtime Reporter and Not

en agreement? A. Well, there have been addenda to the agreement, if I recall correctly, but sitting here today, the parties to the agreement include Virginia Roberts, and her -- well, attorneys representing -- I ROUGH DRAFT ONLY HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021862 Oo O DN OO FF WwW NY =| NO RO PO PNP NM NO | S| S| HS SF S|

I'm putting aside her attorneys. MR. SCAROLA: Attorneys. MR. SIMPSON: Attorneys. MR. SCAROLA: Attorneys. MR. SIMPSON: Yes. MR. SCAROLA: Not just Virginia Roberts' attorneys, but any attorney sharing a common interest privilege? MR. SIMPSON: No. No. MR. SCAROLA: Okay. Well I'm not going to let him -- BY MR. S

ofessor Dershowitz engaged in this sexual misconduct with Miss Roberts; she's Jane Doe Number 3, correct? A. That's right. Jane Doe Number 3 is Miss Virginia Roberts Goufrey * (ph). Q. And I will ask you questions about that. But my question now is: You also allege that Professor Dershowitz was a participant in the abuse

| NO RO PO PNP NM NO | S| S| HS SF S| S| S| S| S| non BP WO NO -|- ODO OO WDN OO OT BP WO NYO — 28 A. Correct. Q. And focusing now, not -- not on Virginia Roberts, we are focusing on the other minors, correct? I just have that in mind, right? A. I'm sorry. Could you repeat the question? Q. I want to m

sor Paul Cassell. With me is Joni J. Jones from the Utah Attorney General's Office. MS. McCAWLEY: Sigrid McCawley on behalf of Virginia Roberts from Boies Schiller & Flexner. MR. SIMPSON: Richard Simpson on behalf of Defendant and Counter-Claim Plaintiff Alan Dershowitz. And with me is my colleague Nicole Richardson and

s filed a pleading in the Federal Action titled "Jane Doe #3 and Jane Doe #4's Motion Pursuant to Rule 21 for

sel for Plaintiff Cassell to: o: Joni J. S to: Bradley J. Edwards, Esq, Farmer, Jaffe et al, Paul G. Cassell, Esq.,; Sigrid S. McCawley, Esq., Boies Schiller & Flexner, LLP, this day of February, 2016. By: sffhomas E. Scott THOMAS E. SCOTT FBN: 149100 17 to: 0: EFTA00613407 EXHIBIT A EFTA00613408 IN T

lp.com; [email protected]; [email protected] Boies Schiller & Flexner, LLP 401 E Las Olas Boulevard., Suite 1200 Fort

12, 2016, and in support thereof states the following: On January 16, 2016, Defendant Alan M. Dershowitz began the deposition of non-party Virginia Roberts Giuffre (“Roberts”). Pursuant to this Court’s January 12, 2016 Confidentiality Order, that transcript currently is under seal. The Confidentiality Order shou

n M. Dershowitz began the deposition of non-party Virginia Roberts Giuffre (“Roberts”). Pursuant to this Court’s January 12,

support thereof states the following: On January 16, 2016, Defendant Alan M. Dershowitz began the deposition of non-party Virginia Roberts Giuffre (“Roberts”). Pursuant to this Court’s January 12, 2016 Confidentiality Order, that transcript currently is under seal. The Confidentiality Order should be modi

poena, as to the law firm, is quashed As to the "Jane Doe #3" subpoena: The motion is granted as to request #9