Epstein Secrets

he careers of Monica Bel- Hunter, Milla Jovovich, Rebecca ., Sharon Stone, and Estella War- ton and other w

hbors. According to Jane Doe 102 vs. Jeffrey Epstein, a civil complaint 1 their minds as they realized | filed in 2009 by a woman later identified as Virginia Roberts, one ; chamber.” . of the services Maxwell provided for Epstein was the procure- owed by an international scan- ; ment of underage women. (Through he

th, or with any criminal activities committed by Jeffrey Epstein. ‘But Ghislaine, who had grown 4 In a 2016 answer to a defamation lawsuit brought by Roberts, md counted the Duke of York, “4 i Maxwell called the allegations fabricated for financial gain.) sates, could not escape the dark 1 The case of Nad

things they see is ‘Sex Trafficking’!! had written. ie en oe Sa F aa aby -) ~~ CNadia Marcinkova: circ , ‘ C2 has offices in N motion— flying to Virgin Islands. O} Paris. And when he comes | where important people—c 3 university presidents, Nobe _ ex-presidents, and heads of si : Some guests marvel i

hone Conversation Between Alan M. Dershowitz and Rebecca, attached hereto as Exhibit H. As a result, Rober

12, 2016, and in support thereof states the following: On January 16, 2016, Defendant Alan M. Dershowitz began the deposition of non-party Virginia Roberts Giuffre (“Roberts”). Pursuant to this Court’s January 12, 2016 Confidentiality Order, that transcript currently is under seal. The Confidentiality Order shou

n M. Dershowitz began the deposition of non-party Virginia Roberts Giuffre (“Roberts”). Pursuant to this Court’s January 12,

support thereof states the following: On January 16, 2016, Defendant Alan M. Dershowitz began the deposition of non-party Virginia Roberts Giuffre (“Roberts”). Pursuant to this Court’s January 12, 2016 Confidentiality Order, that transcript currently is under seal. The Confidentiality Order should be modi

poena, as to the law firm, is quashed As to the "Jane Doe #3" subpoena: The motion is granted as to request #9

e recording of Mr. Dershowitz’s conversation with Rebecca Boylan is admissible (Motion 1n Limine 20)... ce

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK panne nee eee X VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, Plaintiff, Vv. 15-cv-07433-RWS GHISLAINE MAXWELL, Defendant. poe nen nee nee eee eee eee xX Defendant’s Response in Opposition to Plaintiff’s O

RT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK panne nee eee X VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, Plaintiff, Vv. 15-cv-07433-RWS GHI

DISTRICT OF NEW YORK panne nee eee X VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, Plaintiff, Vv. 15-cv-07433-RWS GHISLAINE MAXW

e recording of Mr. Dershowitz’s conversation with Rebecca Boylan is admissible (Motion in Limine 20)... cccc

T SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK wn eee ee eee xX VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, Plaintiff, Vv. 15-cv-07433-RWS GHISLAINE MAXW

T SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK wn eee ee eee xX VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, Plaintiff, Vv. 15-cv-07433-RWS GHI

ISTRICT OF NEW YORK wn eee ee eee xX VIRGINIA L. GIUFFRE, Plaintiff, Vv. 15-cv-07433-RWS GHISLAINE MAXW