Epstein Secrets

d acted in any way inappropriately with regard to Virginia [Giuffre], that I ever touched her, that I ever met her, t

al abuse Allegations. Rather, these records are an important part of this case, since they not only support the conclusion that Dershowitz abused Ms. Giuffre, but also indisputably establish Edwards and Cassell’s strong basis for filing the allegations on her behalf. Moreover, contrary to assertions made i

uded that “at this juncture in the proceedings” details about the sexual abuse she had suffered was unnecessary to making a determination “of whether Jane Doe 3 and Jane Doe 4 should be permitted to join [the other victims’] claim that the Government violated their rights under the CVRA. The factual details r

at question. I am aware that never before 2014, end of December, was it ever, ever alleged that I had acted in any way inappropriately with regard to Virginia [Giuffre], that I ever touched her, that I ever met her, that Ihad ever been with her. I was completely aware ofthat. There had never been any allega

body had taken the photograph. Given the surrounding circumstances, I thought perhaps Mr. Epstein had taken the photograph. So that would have shown Virginia Roberts's sexual abuse was not confined just to Florida, not confined to the New York mansion; it would have -- it would have presumably continued into London

owerful individual that Epstein forced then-minor Jane Doe #3 to have sexual relations with was former Harvard

aware that never, until the lies were put in a legal pleading at the end of December 2014, it was never alleged that I had any sexual contact with Virginia Roberts. I know that it was alleged that I was a 11:38:46 witness to Jeffrey Epstein's alleged abuse and that was false. I was never a witness to any of

neys for Plaintiffs Bradley J. Edwards and Paul G. Cassell Thomas Emerson Scott, Jr., Esquire [email protected]; [email protected] Cole Scott & Kissane P.A. 9150 S Dadeland Boulevard, Suite 1400 Miami, FL 33156 HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_010774 Edwards, Bradley vs. Dershowitz Case No.: CACE 15-000072 Edwards a

rostitution. RESPONSE: Defendant objects to this Document Request as vague because Defendant is not in a position to determine the willful nature of Jane Doe #3’s prostitution. Defendant further objects to this Document Request because Jane Doe #3 has repeatedly and publicly asserted that she gave her body fo

SETTS 5 MISSISSIPPI ® NEW HAMPSHIRE "NEW JERSEY § VIRGINIA ® WASHINGTON 0G PARALEGALS: VIMIAN AYAN-TEJEDA

SMITH BONNIE §. STARK WALTER A. STEIN C4 ot “if ae <L) VIA EMAIL [email protected] February 25, 2015 Thomas Emerson Scott, Jr., Esquire Cole Scott & Kissane P.A. 9150 S Dadeland Boulevard, Suite 1400 Miami, FL 33156 Re: Edwards and Cassell vs. Dershowitz Our File No.: 20150013 Dear Tom: Document 319-1 Ente

12, 2016, and in support thereof states the following: On January 16, 2016, Defendant Alan M. Dershowitz began the deposition of non-party Virginia Roberts Giuffre (“Roberts”). Pursuant to this Court’s January 12, 2016 Confidentiality Order, that transcript currently is under seal. The Confidentiality Order shou

n M. Dershowitz began the deposition of non-party Virginia Roberts Giuffre (“Roberts”). Pursuant to this Court’s January 12,

support thereof states the following: On January 16, 2016, Defendant Alan M. Dershowitz began the deposition of non-party Virginia Roberts Giuffre (“Roberts”). Pursuant to this Court’s January 12, 2016 Confidentiality Order, that transcript currently is under seal. The Confidentiality Order should be modi

poena, as to the law firm, is quashed As to the "Jane Doe #3" subpoena: The motion is granted as to request #9

al abuse Allegations. Rather, these records are an important part of this case, since they not only support the conclusion that Dershowitz abused Ms. Giuffre, but also indisputably establish Edwards and Cassell’s strong basis for filing the allegations on her behalf. Moreover, contrary to assertions made i