Epstein Secrets

en agreement? A. Well, there have been addenda to the agreement, if I recall correctly, but sitting here today, the parties to the agreement include Virginia Roberts, and her -- well, attorneys representing -- I ROUGH DRAFT ONLY HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021862 Oo O DN OO FF WwW NY =| NO RO PO PNP NM NO | S| S| HS SF S|

I'm putting aside her attorneys. MR. SCAROLA: Attorneys. MR. SIMPSON: Attorneys. MR. SCAROLA: Attorneys. MR. SIMPSON: Yes. MR. SCAROLA: Not just Virginia Roberts' attorneys, but any attorney sharing a common interest privilege? MR. SIMPSON: No. No. MR. SCAROLA: Okay. Well I'm not going to let him -- BY MR. S

ofessor Dershowitz engaged in this sexual misconduct with Miss Roberts; she's Jane Doe Number 3, correct? A. That's right. Jane Doe Number 3 is Miss Virginia Roberts Goufrey * (ph). Q. And I will ask you questions about that. But my question now is: You also allege that Professor Dershowitz was a participant in the abuse

| NO RO PO PNP NM NO | S| S| HS SF S| S| S| S| S| non BP WO NO -|- ODO OO WDN OO OT BP WO NYO — 28 A. Correct. Q. And focusing now, not -- not on Virginia Roberts, we are focusing on the other minors, correct? I just have that in mind, right? A. I'm sorry. Could you repeat the question? Q. I want to m

al counsel's office, the university -- I'm sorry -- the Utah Attorney General's office, Attorney General Reaz * (ph) and other persons there. And the Searcy -- well, Mr. Scarola's law firm, I'm trying to remember -- sorry, Jack, I can't remember the name of all your partners off the top of my head. MR. S

be two 17 in four days, so I mean, it was quick. Everything was 18 quick. He proposed to me in October. Got married in 19 December and moved to Virginia, January. Got pregnant 20 in February. 21 Q. Okay. So, October to December, married? 22 A. October he proposed. 23 Q. Okay. 24 A. December

y used to work at a law firm for Searcy & Denney — Q. Okay. A. -- Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley. Q. I'm sorry. I missed that last part. A. Oh, it's Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley. That's the law firm. It's all the names. Q. Gotcha. I'm not familiar with that firm. Is that down here? A.

s case. As one of innumerable examples, on March 8, 2010, Mr. Horowitz, representing seven victims, Jane Doe's 2-8, asked, "Q: In 2004, did you rub Jane Doe 3's vagina? A: Excuse me. I'd like to answer that question, as I would like to answer mostly every question you've asked me here today; however, upon ad

t',152010 a copy of the foregoing has been served via U.S. Mail and email transmittal to all those on the attached service list. By: Jack Scarola Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Barnhart & Shipley 2139 Palm Beach Lakes Blvd West Palm Beach, FL 33409 (561) 68 561 fax OL Flori No.: 169440 37 EFTA0072

ere it would have been possible to have sex with Jane Doe #3."). In media statements, Dershowitz has repeatedl

y Committee held a hearing regarding child endangerment via the Internet. See H.R. Conf. Rep. No. 104-458, at 193 (1996), quoted in United States ' Searcy, 418 F.3d 1193, 1197 (11th Cir. 2005); see also K. Seto, "Note: How Should Legislation Deal with Children and the Victims and Perpetrators of Cyber

while a minor," was a victim of an offense. 3. Jane Doe #3 I. Epstein, 08-CV-80232-KAM: This suit was filed

sing "the need for Congress to take effective action to protect children and families from online harm") (emphasis added); see also United States'. Searcy, 418 F.3d 1193, 1197 (Ilth Cir. 2005) (noting that Congress enacted § 2422(b) "after the Senate Judiciary Committee held a hearing regarding child

charges, would register as a sex offender for life, and "he had made certain concessions related to the payment of damages to the victims, including Jane Doe #I." (DE48 at 12.) Despite this, Petitioners suggest that it was "quite reasonable" for Jane Doe #1 to believe that "Jane Doe #1 also understood her ow

tion for mandamus that would have to be heard within 72 hours." At least one prisoner has filed exactly this type of suit, not once, but twice. See Searcy v. NFN Paletz, 2007 WL 1875802 (D.S.C. June 27, 2007) (prisoner who alleged he was victim of assault filed suit under CVRA attempting to force U.S.

s case. As one of innumerable examples, on March 8, 2010, Mr. Horowitz, representing seven victims, Jane Doe's 2-8, asked, "Q: In 2004, did you rub Jane Doe 3's vagina? A: Excuse me. I'd like to answer that question, as I would like to answer mostly every question you've asked me here today; however, upon ad

ovided notice that he wished to take the deposition of Tommy Mattola. That assertion is untrue. Mr. Mattola's deposition was set by the law finn of Searcy Denny Scarola Barnhart and Shipley. See Edwards Affidavit, Exhibit "N" at 116. 74. Edwards gave notice that he intended to take David Copperfield's

s case. As one of innumerable examples, on March 8, 2010, Mr. Horowitz, representing seven victims, Jane Doe's 2-8, asked, "Q: In 2004, did you rub Jane Doe 3's vagina? A: Excuse me. I'd like to answer that question, as I would like to answer mostly every question you've asked me here today; however, upon ad

ber old i,2010 a copy of the foregoing has been served via U.S. Mail and email transmittal to all those on the attached service list. Jack Scarola Searcy, Denney, Scarola, Bamhart & Shipley By: 37 OL No.: 169440 EFTA00188902 Case 9:08-cv-80736-KAM ,current 291-15 Entered on FLSD L_ Ket 01/21/20

llow the Fifth Circuit's holding in Dean (and the view of the U.S. District Courts for the Eastern District of New York and the Eastern District of Virginia) and conclude that the CVRA extends rights to Jane Doe #1 and Jane Doe #2 under the facts of this case. C. The U.S. Attorney's Office Has Previous

tion for mandamus that would have to be heard within 72 hours." At least one prisoner has filed exactly this type of suit, not once, but twice. See Searcy' NFN Pale!; 2007 WL 1875802 (D.S.C. June 27, 2007) (prisoner who alleged he was victim of assault filed suit under CVRA attempting to force U.S. Att