Epstein Secrets

her ill will of the sort that has developed in the past few months. Let me give some examples. On December 14th, after several requests from you and Deborah to replace Max as trustee, Max proposed to Deborah a way to look for a suitable replacement. He suggested he and I make a list of candidates that I

is again shocking, and I will respond in due course. But perhaps you answer the specific question that I posed to you: do you accept the version of the Marital Trust that Max presented? I will repeat what I have written repeatedly, and you continue to avoid. According to Max, the Marital Trust was set up so that

her ill will of the sort that has developed in the past few months. Let me give some examples. On December 14th, after several requests from you and Deborah to replace Max as trustee, Max proposed to Deborah a way to look for a suitable replacement. He suggested he and I make a list of candidates that I

is again shocking, and I will respond in due course. But perhaps you answer the specific question that I posed to you: do you accept the version of the Marital Trust that Max presented? I will repeat what I have written repeatedly, and you continue to avoid. According to Max, the Marital Trust was set up so that

him on replies to you where you have not copied him on your initial email to me, hence my question.</=> I look forward to hearing=from you. Best, Deborah 40 Deborah Pechet Quinan, Esq. ll.M. Shareholder Assistant - Jayne Mahoney: Office: e-mail: > = www.riw.com <http://www.riw.co=/> I BIO <ht

uinan < Cc: Valeria Chomsky < >, Richard Kahn < », Gene Landy =div dir="Itr">We've been trying to figure out the matter of the dist=ibutions from the Marital Trust. We received no notice of this from Max. 1= seems, from what you say here, that the distributions would have gone dir=ctly to the Treasury, for tax

seful. As for distribution to =randchildren's trusts, that was in 2014. I don't recall giving =uthorization then. Noam Forwarded message - From: Deborah =echet Quinan Date: Thu, Nov 9, 2017 at 12:36 PM Subject: RE: =ransfers to/for Noam To: Noam Chomsky Dear Noam and Valeria, 3 EFTA_R1_01720754

eria Chomsky; Gene =andy; Richard Kahn Subject: Re: Transfers to/for =oam BIO We've been trying to figure out the =atter of the distributions from the Marital Trust. We received no =otice of this from Max. It seems, from what you say here, that the =istributions would have gone directly to the Treasury, for tax

Beyon= that, I will not be able to assist you in pursuit of any further action against Bain, due to my firm's previously disclosed conflic=. Best, Deborah Deborah Pechet Quinan, Esq. L1.M. Shareholder Chair, Trusts & Estates Group<=pan style="font-size:10.5ptfont-family:"Calibrr,"sans- s=rif";col

r of the missing 100+k. What next? Also, how do you think we should react to Harry's disgusting petitio= to the court demanding full authority over the Marital Trust, including t=e insinuations about Valeria? Right now waiting t= see whether Max will respond to the queries. I rather doubt it. If legal actions ar

ife). And the book publicati=n was delayed and all sorts of legal difficulties and pressure from Max to=have the book only under Noam's name -- with Deborah's endorsement= until Gene Landy stood up in the case. Therefore= in their minds, all the money should be inherited by them. In the will that Max p

st Max, I presume it is clear that the recent proposal trans=itted by Harry's lawyer that I should be satisfied with a handout =f 100k a year from the Marital Trust is too disgraceful for comment. I would like to know what further info=mation you require for reimbursement for tax payment. We have previously t=an

ection, it was 2016, paying 2015 taxes. </=iv> Also, coincidentally or not, 2015 is the year of the mi=sing $117k that we've been repeatedly asking Deborah to inquire about =rom Bainco. Have been sending copies to you. No response from them s= far. It's a strange st=ry. On Jan 22 2015, a distribution o

g to do with the technicalities of the handout that Har=y is graciously offering. I'll review the background, once again= As I've discusse= before, the Marital Trust was established in Carol's name for tax pur=oses. The obvious intention, clearly understood by Carol and me, and=of course Eric Menouya, was that it

other questio=s raised above =/u>4. With respect to the =istributions made from the trusts, I would again refer you to the reports =hat I sent to Deborah and Richard. That said, those reports only show the total amounts distributed to you or on your behalf f=om the trusts. From your gift tax returns a

A_R1_01791720 EFTA02602934 When you say they were con=eyed to Carol alone, what exactly does this mean? Conveyed to what? We have been discussing the Marital Trust. Were they conveyed =o this? To a different Trust? Later you refer to a "non-e=empt Trust". Is that a different one? If so, I should kno= more about