l 16, 2018 4:44 PM To: Nick Nichols , t, —.—.„- Cc: Valeria Chomsky Subject: taxes b I b I understand from Richard Kahn that you informed Max=Kohlenberg about the financial information that we provided to you yesterd=y. Plainly, this is quite improper. Kohlenberg has no right to=know anything that I

: taxes To: Noam Chomsky Cc: Valeria Chomsky Dear Noam, and Valeria,</=> Matthew Mazotas We did not disclose any financial or tax infor=ation to Max Kohlenberg in his telephone call to Matt Mazotas earlier this=morning. Max stated that he had received a call from Mr. Kahn inquiring about=Max's ability to ma

ntly delete the original and any copy of thi= message or attachment. Thank you. Kahn. From: Noam Chomsky Sent: Friday, July 06, 2018 8:53 PM To: Max Kohlenberg Subject: Re: Marital Trust I am not represented=on this issue, so you can send the information to me directly, copying Ric=ard Noam On Fri, Jul 6

://maps.google.com/?q=575+Lexington+Avenue,+4t=+Floor+New+York,+NY+10022&entry=gmail&source=g> Phone Fax Cell Begin forw=rded message: From: Max=Kohlenberg < Subject: Marital Trus=s Noam — > > Thank you for your reply. As you indic=te that you are not being represented by counsel I will reply direct

am Cr> I u=derstand from Richard Kahn that you informed Max Kohlenberg about the fina=cial information that we provided to you yesterday, and that Kohlenberg in=turn informed my children about this. Plainly, this is quite imprope=. Kohlenberg is not my lawyer and has no right to know anything that=l do no

To: jeffrey E.; Valeria Chomsky Subject: proposed letter to Nick Nichols Is this OK? Noam Cr> I u=derstand from Richard Kahn that you informed Max Kohlenberg about the fina=cial information that we provided to you yesterday, and that Kohlenberg in=turn informed my children about this. Plainly, this is qui

EFTA02471227 Nick From: Noam Chomsky Sent: Monday, April 16, 2018 4:44 PM To: Nick Nichols I understand from Richard Kahn that you informed Max=Kohlenberg about the financial information that we provided to you yesterd=y. Plainly, this is quite improper. Kohlenberg has no right to=know anything that I

taxes To: Noam Chomsky =c: Valeria Chomsky Dear Noam, and Valeria,</=> , Matthew Mazotas We did not disclose any financial or tax infor=ation to Max Kohlenberg in his telephone call to Matt Mazotas earlier this=morning. Max stated that he had received a call from Mr. Kahn inquiring about=Max's ability to ma

19 PM To: Nick Nichols Cc: Valeria Chomsky Subject: Fwd: taxes I am glad we agree that no information about our fina=ces should be provided to Max Kohlenberg, or anyone else. Do you now=have all the information you need for filing the extension? If not, =hat should we send? We have been advised that sin=

y. Best regards, Nick From: Noam Chomsk Sent: Monday, April 1 , . To: Nick Nichols «mailt I understand from Richard Kahn that you informed Max=Kohlenberg about the financial information that we provided to you yesterd=y. Plainly, this is quite improper. Kohlenberg has no right to=know anything that I

From: Noam Chomsky Sent: Thursday, August 31, 2017 4:21 AM To: jeffrey E.; Valeria Chomsky Subject: Re: query Here are the phone numbers: (Kohlenberg) (Bain) On Thu, Aug 31,=2017 at 12:16 AM, Noam Chomsky <mailto > wrot=: OK. Will add <=iv class="gmail_quote">On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 10:29 PM,

de him with anything he requires. 4> he should have access to all. On Wed, Aug 30, 2017 at 8:42 PM, Noam Chomsky < </=» wrote: Would this letter to Max Kohlenberg and Sam Bain be OK? Want to che=k with you before sending, to see if I am doing it correctly. Noam =br> We are now working with a financial advis

Begin forwarded message: From: =/b>Deborah Pechet Quinan Subject: qb>RE: Time to =alk Date: =/b>December 1, 2017 at 11:45:25 AM =ST To: =/b>'Max Kohlenberg' Cc: "Noam Chomsky "Valeria Chomsky "Richard Kahn Max, 4:00 p.m. will work for me. What tel It shall I =all? Deborah Deborah Pechet Quinan, Es

ney: 617.570.3581 1 EFTA_R1_01719755 EFTA02559418 Office: 617.742.4200 Fax: 617.742-2355 e-mail www.riw.com <http://www.riw.com/> I BIO From: Max Kohlenberg [mailto: Sent: Friday, December 01, 2017 =1:25 AM To: Deborah Pechet Quinan Cc: Noam Chomsky Richard Kahn Subject: RE: Time to talk Deborah =E2

ren. 40 otherwise ok On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 3:59 PM, Noam Chomsky < Is this OK? Noam » wrote: I understa=d from Richard Kahn that you informed Max Kohlenberg about the financial i=formation that we provided to you yesterday, and that Kohlenberg in turn i=formed my children about this. Plainly, this is qui

wrote: I understa=d from Richard Kahn that you informed Max Kohlenberg about the financial i=formation that we provided to you yesterday, and that Kohlenberg in turn i=formed my children about this. Plainly, this is quite improper.Q Kohlenberg is not my lawyer and has no right to know anything that I do=

E: taxes To: Noam Chomsky Cc: Valeri= Chomsky Dear Noam, and Valeria,</=> atthew Mazotas We did not disclose any financial or tax infor=ation to Max Kohlenberg in his telephone call to Matt Mazotas earlier this=morning. Max stated that he had received a call from Mr. Kahn inquiring about=Max's ability to ma

FTA_R1_01582511 EFTA02471081 From: Noam Chomsk Sent: Monday, April 1 , : To: Nick Nichols I understand from Richard Kahn that you informed Max=Kohlenberg about the financial information that we provided to you yesterd=y. Plainly, this is quite improper. Kohlenberg has no right to=know anything that I

om Richard Kahn that you informed Max Kohlenberg about the financial information that we provided to you yesterday. Plainly, this is quite improper. Kohlenberg has no right to know anything that I do not personally provide him with. This is a serious breach of confidentiality. Could you please inform me --

Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 20:47:05 +0000 ok On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 4:44 PM, Noam Chomsky > wrote: I understand from Richard Kahn that you informed Max Kohlenberg about the financial information that we provided to you yesterday. Plainly, this is quite improper. Kohlenberg has no right to know anything that I

mail.com Subject: Fwd: taxes Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 23:18:40 +0000 I am glad we agree that no information about our finances should be provided to Max Kohlenberg, or anyone else. Do you now have all the information you need for filing the extension? If not, what should we send? We have been advised that sinc

om Richard Kahn that you informed Max Kohlenberg about the financial information that we provided to you yesterday. Plainly, this is quite improper. Kohlenberg has no right to know anything that I do not personally provide him with. This is a serious breach of confidentiality. Could you please inform me --

Bainco and Mr. Chomsky had recently entered into a Confidential Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release of Claims (the "Settlement Agreement"). Mr. Kohlenberg told Mr. Bain that you had disclosed to him the subject matter of the Settlement Agreement and the amount paid by Bainco to Mr. Chomsky pursuant th

national Investors LLC ("Bainco"), has informed me that he received a call on Thursday, March 29, from one of Bainco's investment advisory clients, Max Kohlenberg, a co-trustee of the Carol Chomsky Exempt Marital Trust and the Carol Chomsky Non-Exempt Marital Trust (together, "Carol Chomsky's Trusts"), reporti

e-nyt-region> On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 7:18 PM, Noam Chomsky wrote: I am glad we agree that no information about our finances should be=provided to Max Kohlenberg, or anyone else. Do you now have all the =nformation you need for filing the extension? If not, what should we=send? We have been advised that sinc

Monday, April 16, 2018 4:44 PM To: Nick Nichols Cc: Valeria Chomsky <mailto: Subject: taxes I understand from Richard Kahn that you informed Max=Kohlenberg about the financial information that we provided to you yesterd=y. Plainly, this is quite improper. Kohlenberg has no right to=know anything that I

ndence concerning these issues, which you will find attached. Similarly, we have not been engaged to make any claim against Noam's former attorney, Max Kohlenberg. You have informed us that Noam has engaged Steptoe & Johnson to represent Noam in adversarial dealings with Max Kohlenberg. As we discussed with y

ged Steptoe & Johnson to represent Noam in adversarial dealings with Max Kohlenberg. As we discussed with you in the call, any discovery of Attorney Kohlenberg's EFTA00850356 malpractice coverage, assuming that such insurance is discoverable, should be done by Steptoe & Johnson or directly by our clients

w.riw.com/> I 4> BIO <http://www.riw.com/attorney/deborah-pechet-quinan/> 40 <=pan style="font-size:10.0ptfont-family:"Tahoma","sans-se=if"">From: Max Kohlenberg (mak° Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2017 6:57 AM To: Deborah Pechet Quinan Subject: Carol S. Chomsky Marital Trusts - Distribution Q Deborah —

hen ask Noam'= investment advisors at Bainco to raise the necessary funds and make the p=yment. Looking forward to your reply,</=> Max 40 A. M=x Kohlenberg Howl=nd Evangelista Kohlenberg Burnett, LLP One =inancial Plaza — Suite 1600 Prov=dence, Rhode Island 02903 5 EFTA_R1_01701836 EFTA02547494 D

Begin forwarded message: From: =/b>Deborah Pechet Quinan Subject: =/b>RE: Time to =alk Date: =/b>December 1, 2017 at 12:47:04 PM =ST To: =/b>'Max Kohlenberg' Cc: "Noam Chomsky "Valeria Chomsky "Richard Kahn Max, Let's use the bridge line below instead as =ichard may be available to join us. 866-506-

2558383 Shareholder Chair, Trusts & Estates =roup 255 State Street, 7th Floor I Boston, MA 02109 I www.riw.com <http://www.riw.com/> I WO From: Max Kohlenberg [mailto Sent: Friday, December 01, 2017 =2:09 PM To: Deborah Pechet Quinan Cc: Noam Chomsky =aleria Chomsky cmailt° Richard Kahn Subject: RE:

x and Sam that led to a situa=ion where for the first time in my life, I have to face financial problems= But maybe notj Forwarded messa e Fro=: Max Kohlenberg Date: Thu, Oct 26, 2017 at 1:55 AM Subject: RE: trust =o: Noam Chomsky Good morning (from Scotland) Noam -<=> When we were last in touch on this

: Noam Chomsky > Date: 10/16/17 9:14 PM (GMT-05:00) To: Max Kohlenberg < <mailto > Subject: Re: trust I meant $500,000. Noam On Mon • PM M x Kohlenberg <=a href="mailto: target="_blank" wrote: Forgive me for asking Noam, but did you mean $500,00=, or $50,000? Thanks, Max S=nt from my Verizon, S

Chomsky Subject: Re: taxes ok On Mon, Apr 16, 2018 at 4:44 PM, Noam Chomsky <mailto » wrote: I understand from Richard Kahn that you informed Max Kohlenberg about =he financial information that we provided to you yesterday. Plainly =this is quite improper. Kohlenberg has no right to know anything tha= I

om Richard Kahn that you informed Max Kohlenberg about =he financial information that we provided to you yesterday. Plainly =this is quite improper. Kohlenberg has no right to know anything tha= I do not personally provide him with. This is a serious breach of c=nfidentiality. Could you please inform me --

om Richard Kahn that you informed Max Kohlenberg about the financial information that we provided to you yesterday. Plainly, this is quite improper. Kohlenberg has no right to know anything that I do not personally provide him with. This is a serious breach of confidentiality. Could you please inform me --

Valeria Chomsky Bcc: [email protected] Subject: taxes Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2018 20:44:13 +0000 I understand from Richard Kahn that you informed Max Kohlenberg about the financial information that we provided to you yesterday. Plainly, this is quite improper. Kohlenberg has no right to know anything that I

ermanently delete the original and any copy of thi= message or attachment. Thank you. From: Noam Cho=sk Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2018 7:53 PM To: Max Kohlenberg Subject: Marital Trust Max,=span style="font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif""><=u> I presume it is clear that the rec=nt proposal transmitted by Har

ding each a letter. On Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 1:44 PM, Noam Cho=sky > wrote: What's next? Forwarded message From: <= class="gmail_sendername">Max Kohlenberg Date: Fri, Jul 6, 2018 at 4:24 AM Subject: RE: Ma=ital Tr To: Noam Chomsky <n Noam —<=u> Thanks for your message a=d your inquiry. I would like