Epstein Secrets

e particularly inappropriate, counsel urged, since defendant spent so little time in New York in the first place. Defendant's "primary residence is the U.S. Virgin Islands," counsel urged; and, in addition to his home in New York, he maintained "vacation" homes in Florida and New Mexico as well (H6-7). For these reas

ase and thus posed a significant risk to the community. The court acted correctly, and certainly well within its discretion, when it concluded that the People's stated concerns did not cast any meaningful doubt on the propriety of the Board's recommendation. D. Nor is defendant persuasive when he contends

e particularly inappropriate, counsel urged, since defendant spent so little time in New York in the first place. Defendant's "primary residence is the U.S. Virgin Islands," counsel urged; and, in addition to his home in New York, he maintained "vacation" homes in Florida and New Mexico as well (H6-7). For these reas

ase and thus posed a significant risk to the community. The court acted correctly, and certainly well within its discretion, when it concluded that the People's stated concerns did not cast any meaningful doubt on the propriety of the Board's recommendation. D. Nor is defendant persuasive when he contends

e particularly inappropriate, counsel urged, since defendant spent so little time in New York in the first place. Defendant's "primary residence is the U.S. Virgin Islands," counsel urged; and, in addition to his home in New York, he maintained "vacation" homes in Florida and New Mexico as well (H6-7). For these reas

ase and thus posed a significant risk to the community. The court acted correctly, and certainly well within its discretion, when it concluded that the People's stated concerns did not cast any meaningful doubt on the propriety of the Board's recommendation. D. Nor is defendant persuasive when he contends