Epstein Secrets

mation and belief, the remaining Defendant, L.S.J., LLC, is organized in the State of Delaware and maintains its principal place of business within the U.S. Virgin Islands. 5. This Court has original jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a) because the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000, exclu

e with the laws of the Virgin Islands applicable to agreements entered Into entirely within the Virgin Islands, without regard to the principles of Virgin Islands' law regarding conflicts of ;mks. 19. Each Party irrevocably and unconditionally submits to the exclusive jurisdiction of any court sitting in the

rights among the parties is warranted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2201. WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs demand judgment against the Defendants as follows: a. Adjudging and declaring that Plaintiffs substantially performed their duties as required by the Design Services Agreement; 4 EFTA00308305 Case: 3:10-cv-0

a world-renowned interior designer. . 8. Jeffrey Epstein, via his company L.S.J., LLC, is the owner of Little Saint James, a 70-acre island within the U.S. Virgin Islands. 9. In 2005, the parties entered into an agreement whereby the Plaintiffs would provide design services for the residential compound Epstein was c

rights among the parties is warranted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2201. WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs demand judgment against the Defendants as follows: a. Adjudging and declaring that Plaintiffs substantially performed their duties as required by the Design Services Agreement; EFTA00310026 Case: 3:10-cv-0003

rmation and belief, the remaining Defendant, L.SJ., LLC, is organized in the State of Delaware and maintains its principal place of business within the U.S. Virgin Islands. 5. This Court has original jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332(a) because the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000, exclu

rights among the parties is warranted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2201. WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs demand judgment against the Defendants as follows: a. Adjudging and declaring that Plaintiffs substantially performed their duties as required by the Design Services Agreement; 4 EFTA00299559 Case: 3:10-cv-0