Epstein Secrets

Paneling Inc. Civil No. ST-10-CV-443 Memorandum Opinion Page 2 of 11 FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff Jeffrey Epstein, a resident of the Virgin Islands,2 is the sole member of Plaintiff L.S.J., LLC. L.S.J.3 owns Little St. James, which is an island off of the southeast coast of St. Thomas. In 2005, E

nstallation of the cabinets, in performance of its contract with Molyneux, were to benefit Epstein and L.S.J., and would be used in a library in the Virgin Islands.' On July 30, 2010, Plaintiffs filed the Complaint in this action, alleging that the cabinetry installation had not been properly completed, that t

iction is proper under section 4903(a)(2). All that is required to satisfy section 4903(a)(2) is that a "contract be performed, at least in part, in the virgin Islands and that the cause of action arise out of the contract."31 If a defendant knows that the ultimate destination of its goods will be the Virgin Island

, inter alia, "personal delivery in the manner prescribed for service within this territory!" Service in the Territory must conform with Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.1° Rule 4(h) requires, in relevant part, that corporations be served by delivering the summons and complaint to "an officer, a managing o

der to coerce the plaintiff into compliance. Amended complaint paragraph 48 and 50. For example, while being transported to Epstein's island in the U.S. Virgin Islands, Epstein, Maxwell, and took possession of the plaintiff's passport in order to coerce her to comply with their demands, including their demands th

fraud or coercion against any of the defendants; third, the amended complaint impermissibly lumps the defendants together in violation of Rule 8 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure; and, fourth, the amended complaint fails to demonstrate that the alleged fraudulent or coercive conduct caused the plaintiff to engage

relations with Dershowitz on numerous occasions while she was a minor, not only in Florida but also on private planes, in New York, New Mexico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. In addition to being a participant in the abuse of Jane Doe #3 and other minors, Deshowitz was an eye-witness to the sexual abuse of many other mi

orcement proceeding because it is not a "civil action" against the Government. To be sure, this Court has determined that convenience dictates that the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure "govern the general course of this proceeding." See DE 257 at 3. But that procedural determination does not alter the substance of this ca

d other investigations into Epstein's sex trafficking, because it knew it would be exposed as assisting in Epstein's scheme. 159. During a trip to the U.S. Virgin Islands in January 2007, Jane Doe 1 was repeatedly raped and coerced into commercial sex. She was paid $10,000 in hush money, which Epstein's agents appare

e other Class members. 284. This action has been brought and may properly be maintained as a class action against JP Morgan pursuant to Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure because there is a well-defined community of interest in the litigation and the proposed Class is easily ascertainable from JP Morgan's r