Epstein Secrets

che Date: August 5, 2016 at 8:44:46 AM EDT To: "Rich Kahne< Reply-To: "Ens, Amanda" < BMY in a BIG s

OS endpoints. BMY is trading down 18% on the back of the results while MRK is trading +12%. Note AZN has reversed earlier losses (now +1.3%) while Roche is +0.6%. Note that MRK's data from KN-024 had PDL1 tumor expression >50% vs BMY's trial which was >5%....could be an issue of trial design here.

zz%20%28News%20&%20Buzz%2 9> R&D tax scheme too rich, federal panel finds Globe and Mail<http://www.t

the morning a customer sold 1200 December 75 calls at $1.70 and $1.75, possibly to overwrite an equity position. IDIX ($5.15 +0.2%) following the Roche acquisition of Anadys, a bullish customer sold the November 5 puts and bought the Jan 7.5 calls 8000x paying up to $0.30 for the package. Secondari

that if you did this 5 every weekend you'd be rich, didn't you? 6 A. No. That's what told me. Y

Florida. A state-court case is properly removable when "it could have been brought, originally, in a federal district court." Lincoln Prop. Co. v. Roche, 546 U.S. 81, 83 (2005) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a)). This case was originally filed in federal district court, and it is the same case today. Even

tates Austrew. 100 P. seep. ea2 (1).51€1.1 ). rich, who frequented during this period. After a few

Northern District of Call- the conviction of the defendant Cousins fognia, Southern Division, Michael J. on the conspiracy count; and since a per- Roche, J., rendered judgment, and de- son cannot conspire with himself or her- fendant appealed. The Court of Appeals, self, it necessarily follows that

that if you did this 5 every weekend you'd be rich, didn't you? 6 A. No. That's what Lold me. 7

Florida. A state-court case is properly removable when "it could have been brought, originally, in a federal district court." Lincoln Prop. Co. v. Roche, 546 U.S. 81, 83 (2005) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a)). This case was originally filed in federal district court, and it is the same case today. Even

that if you did this 5 every weekend you'd be rich, didn't you? 6 A. No. That's what Lold me. 7

Florida. A state-court case is properly removable when "it could have been brought, originally, in a federal district court." Lincoln Prop. Co. v. Roche, 546 U.S. 81, 83 (2005) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a)). This case was originally filed in federal district court, and it is the same case today. Even

tors included D.E. Shaw and related entities and Rich Fricsner Nimbus Nimbus Discovery uses computati

9m. In December 2012, the Principals invested Slim at a valuation of 5204m. Other investors in the round included Kleiner Perkins, Google Ventures, Roche and Labcorp. In September 2013, J.P. Morgan and Goldman Sachs led the IPO of Foundation Medicine. As of 240, January 2014, Foundation Medicine had

IIII that if you did this every weekend you'd be rich, didn't you? A. No. That's what told me. Q.

f Florida. A state-court case is properly removable when "it could have been brought, originally, in a federal district court." Lincoln Prop. Co.'. Roche, 546 U.S. 81, 83 (2005) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a)). This case was originally filed in federal district court, and it is the same case today. Even

to that if you did this every weekend you'd be rich, didn't you? A. No. That's what told me. Q.

Florida. A state-court case is properly removable when "it could have been brought, originally, in a federal district court." Lincoln Prop. Co. v. Roche, 546 U.S. 81, 83 (2005) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1441(a)). This case was originally filed in federal district court, and it is the same case today. Even

ril" Non , . da•Chet «Meg a jfli t•• Pa" nto rich pm WY MN gin lbla fe Dada SSW Or tee Inaura P n

Period Please see Informs". Atoul Your Account ~eon for Be Cakulabon of Balance Subrcl b Interest Pate Anneal Renewal Nobee. How to Aval Sanest on Roche:ea and alen orderstaf Inlatenalbst as appliostr ONSTAINE NMAXWEU. This Statement is a Facsimile - Not an original naaaa:0 On 0.e I. 2 <0 ben be