Epstein Secrets

ce where law mandated consecutive one); Ex parte Rich, 194 S.W.3d 508, 515 (Tex. Crim. App. 2006) (cou

ity is "at its most limited when reviewing the Executive's exercise of discretion over charging determinations." Id. In Fokker, the question before the D.C. Circuit was whether the district court had the power to decline to enter a speedy trial waiver because it believed that the terms of the DPA were too lenie

for child trafficking. Epstein, famous for being rich, being friends ‘v ith Bill Clinton having an egg-

e of Law at the University of Utah. Before coming to Utah. he was President of the Stanford Law Review, a law clerk for then-Judge Antonin Scalia on the D.C. Circuit and for Chief Justice Warren Burger of the Supreme Court. an Ass iate Deputy Attorney General with the . Justice Department (1986-88), and an Assi

iami, Flori Telephon Facsim. E-Mail: ILL AM L. RICH Fla. Bar No. EFTA00179067 CERTIFICATE OF SERV

91-01386, 969 F.2d 995, 997 (11th Cir. 1992) (citation omitted). In United States v. Legal Servs. for New York City, 249 F.3d 1077 (D.C. Cir. 2001), the D.C. Circuit stated that "[c]ourts have consistently held that the general subject matters of clients' representations are not privileged. Nor does the general

relevant to the employment relationship. Thus, as the D.C. Circuit has observed, ‘‘an employer’s right to silence is

to its property.’’ The Board disagrees that the property rights discussed in Lechmere emanate from the First Amendment, see Thunder Basin Coal Co. v. Reich, 510 U.S. 200, 217 n.21 (1994) (“The right of employers to exclude union organizers from their private property emanates from state common law * * *.