Epstein Secrets

rt for the Southern District of New York, Robert W. Sweet, J., 2017 WL 1787934, 325 F.Supp.3d 428,

njoy no presumption of public access." Finally, in appropriate circumstances, district courts may impose sanctions on attorneys and parties under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 11(c)." 40 Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(c); see also TheStreet Com, 273 F.3d at 229-30. 41 See, e.g., S.D.N.Y. Electronic Case Filing Rules & Instruction

nited States in United States of America v. Scott W. Rothstein, Case No. 09-60331CR-Cohn, United Stat

rivolous; 17. That the presentation of such evidence by counsel for JONES demonstrates a lack of a good faith basis to prevent same in violation of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, 1 I: IS. That MORSE has demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence, ownership of these funds by JONES, that said funds are hereby frozen and no

nited States in United States of America v. Scott W. Rothstein Case No. 09-60331CR-Cohn, United State

ut merit and frivoh • 17. Tha, presentation of such evidence by counsel for JONES demonstrates a lack of a basis to prevent same in violation of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, 11: MORSE has demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence, ownership of these + funds by JONES, that said funds are hereby frozen and not subje

ted States; and (r9) Guitar collection of Scott W. Rothstein, located at the residence of Scott and

rivolous; 17. That the presentation of such evidence by counsel for JONES demonstrates a lack of a good faith basis to prevent same in violation of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, 11: 18. That MORSE has demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence, ownership of these funds by JONES, that said funds arc hereby frozen and not

nited States in United States of America I. Scott W. Rothstein, Case No. 09-60331CR-Cohn, United Stat

rivolous; 17. That the presentation of such evidence by counsel for JONES demonstrates a lack of a good faith basis to prevent same in violation of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, 11; 18. That MORSE has demonstrated by clear and convincing evidence, ownership of these funds by JONES, that said funds are hereby frozen and not