Epstein Secrets

.S. Dep't ofJustice, 218 F.3d 760 (D.C. Cir. 2000) 9, 13 Mead Data Central, Inc. v. U.S. Dep't of the Air Force, 566 F.2d 242 (1977) 6 Meyer v. Bush, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13626 (D.D.C. Sept. 30, 1991), rev'd on other grounds, 981 F.2d 1288 (D.C. Cir. 1993) 7 Morley v. C.I.A., 508 F.3d 1108 (

f good faith, this primarily is for determining the need for further fact-finding. See, e.g., Wood v. FBI, 432 F.3d 78, 85 (2d Cir. 2005); see also Wither v. NSA, 592 F.3d 60, 69, 73 (2d Cir. 2009) (presumption does not replace de novo review by courts). The Government contends that the withheld infor

.S. Dep't ofJustice, 218 F.3d 760 (D.C. Cir. 2000) 9, 13 Mead Data Central, Inc. v. U.S. Dep't of the Air Force, 566 F.2d 242 (1977) 6 Meyer v. Bush, 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13626 (D.D.C. Sept. 30, 1991), rev'd on other grounds, 981 F.2d 1288 (D.C. Cir. 1993) 7 Morley v. C.I.A., 508 F.3d 1108 (

f good faith, this primarily is for determining the need for further fact-finding. See, e.g., Wood v. FBI, 432 F.3d 78, 85 (2d Cir. 2005); see also Wither v. NSA, 592 F.3d 60, 69, 73 (2d Cir. 2009) (presumption does not replace de novo review by courts). The Government contends that the withheld infor

very grateful. Respectfully Submitted. Kenneth W. Starr RFP MIA 000443 EFTA00208924 12/11/2007

ey are entitled. Despite this fact. Ms. proposed a Victims Notification letter to be sent to the alleged lialeral victims. Ms. IIMIM has gone even Wither. alleging that the "victims" may make written statements or testily against Mr. Epstein at the sentencing. We lind no basis in law or the Agreement