Back to Network
6
Shared Docs
6
Same-Page
6 / 6
Mentions
Document Mentions (6 shared documents)
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
av , 2009 Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Katherine W. Ezell, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 25 West Flagl
tted a crime, and because Plaintiff surely would have charged that Defendant actually committed a crime if she had a good-faith basis for doing so, Counts IV and V must be dismissed with prejudice. VII. COUNT SIX MUST BE DISMISSED BECAUSE 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(g) WAS NOT ENACTED UNTIL 2006. Count VI of the
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
av , 2009 Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Katherine W. Ezell, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 25 West Flagl
tted a crime, and because Plaintiff surely would have charged that Defendant actually committed a crime if she had a good-faith basis for doing so, Counts IV and V must be dismissed with prejudice. VII. COUNT SIX MUST BE DISMISSED BECAUSE 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(g) WAS NOT ENACTED UNTIL 2006. Count VI of the
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
av , 2009 Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Katherine W. Ezell, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 25 West Flagl
tted a crime, and because Plaintiff surely would have charged that Defendant actually committed a crime if she had a good-faith basis for doing so, Counts IV and V must be dismissed with prejudice. VII. COUNT SIX MUST BE DISMISSED BECAUSE 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(g) WAS NOT ENACTED UNTIL 2006. Count VI of the
Sponsored
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ay , 2009 Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Katherine W. Ezell, Esq. Podhurst Orsecic, P.A. 25 West Flag
tted a crime, and because Plaintiff surely would have charged that Defendant actually committed a crime if she had a good-faith basis for doing so, Counts IV and V must be dismissed with prejudice. VII. COUNT SIX MUST BE DISMISSED BECAUSE 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(g) WAS NOT ENACTED UNTIL 2006. Count VI of the
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
av , 2009 Robert C. Josefsberg, Esq. Katherine W. Ezell, Esq. Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 25 West Flagl
tted a crime, and because Plaintiff surely would have charged that Defendant actually committed a crime if she had a good-faith basis for doing so, Counts IV and V must be dismissed with prejudice. VII. COUNT SIX MUST BE DISMISSED BECAUSE 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(g) WAS NOT ENACTED UNTIL 2006. Count VI of the
2 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
1 Robert C. Jose s re gt1tIo. 040856 Katherine W. Ezell, Bar No. 114771 Podhurst Orseck, P.A. 25
tted a crime, and because Plaintiff surely would have charged that Defendant actually committed a crime if she had a good-faith basis for doing so, Counts IV and, must be dismissed with prejudice. VII. COUNT SIX MUST BE DISMISSED BECAUSE 18 U.S.C. § 2252A(g) WAS NOT ENACTED UNTIL 2006. Count VI of the F
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (121)
Entities connected to both George W. Bush and Counts IV
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON5,075 w/ George·8 w/ Counts
United States
LOCATION2,223 w/ George·8 w/ Counts
Ghislaine Maxwell
PERSON1,138 w/ George·2 w/ Counts
Bradley Edwards
PERSON907 w/ George·3 w/ Counts
LB
Leon Black
PERSON901 w/ George·6 w/ Counts
Alan Dershowitz
PERSON865 w/ George·6 w/ Counts
Prince Andrew
PERSON817 w/ George·6 w/ Counts
Lesley Groff
PERSON715 w/ George·2 w/ Counts
JG
Jack Goldberger
PERSON704 w/ George·6 w/ Counts
MF
Maria Farmer
PERSON680 w/ George·2 w/ Counts
JD
Jane Doe
PERSON593 w/ George·8 w/ Counts
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON487 w/ George·6 w/ Counts
Michael Jackson
PERSON445 w/ George·2 w/ Counts
Oliver Stone
PERSON320 w/ George·6 w/ Counts
Alfredo Rodriguez
PERSON281 w/ George·6 w/ Counts
RC
Robert D. Critton
PERSON278 w/ George·4 w/ Counts
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION238 w/ George·6 w/ Counts
U.S. Virgin Islands
LOCATION238 w/ George·3 w/ Counts
LV
Larry Visoski
PERSON228 w/ George·2 w/ Counts
West Palm Beach
LOCATION219 w/ George·2 w/ Counts