Epstein Secrets

the issues and the defenses in the litigation"). W. The information simply falls under the "highly pr

Doe v. Epstein 08-CV80119 Page No. 26 also Fed.R.Civ.P. 26(b)(1) and Fla. Stat. 768.72; Gallina v. Commerce And Industry, Ins., 2008 WL 3895918 (S.D. Ha. 2009)(unless liability for punitive damages is established at trial, the discovery sought is not relevant). In Gallina, the court held that in lig

pposition Motion (i.e., the Affidavit of Gilbert W. Kliman, M.D.). Instead of addressing each Jane Do

lative to their past medical and psychiatric histories and conduct. See Exhibits "B-G." 21. Cherenfant v. Nationwide Credit, Inc. 2004 WL 5315889 (S.D. Ha. 2004) allows for the discovery sought in Sections II. a-g above and in Defendant's Motion to Identify. See also Fed.R.Civ.Pro. 26; Oppenheimer Fun

ties to Petitioner in this case (identified as "C.W." in the Government's pipers). But neither Petiti

ding royalty, politicians, businessmen, and professional and personal acquaintances. Complaint, Jane Doe No. 102 v. Epstein, No. 9:09-CV-80656- KAM (S.D. Ha. May 1, 2009). 3. In 2006, at the request of the Palm Beach Police Department, the Federal Bureau of Investigation opened an investigation into all

d am Wis. State of Wisconsin v. Robins, 646 N.W. 2d 287 (Wis. 2002) Internet Internet chat room

rt wrote opinion to explain reasons for its departure from guidelines. 2422(b); 2423(b) Consummated U.S. v. Simo, Slip Copy, 2007 WL 1655399 (S.D. Ha. 2007) Slip Copy No Information In No information available. Report and recommendation that guilty plea be accepted. 2422(6) No Information

ded Ben Sprecher's home in Morningside Heights on W. 122nd St. at 6 a.m., seizing an external hard dr

the briefing remains sealed, the decision of District Judge Kenneth E. Marra denying the motion, Doe v. United States, 950 F. Supp. 2d 1262, 1266 (S.D. Ha. 2013), reveals that the government argued the victims did not have standing because the relief they sought—the vacation or rescission of the non-pr

ilar motion on behalf of a non-party known as "E. W.," and that E.W.'s motion is set for hearing on J

. v. Epstein, Case No. 08-80232 (S.D. Fla. 2008); Doe No. 4._vinstein, Case No. 08-80380 (S.D. Fla. 2008); Doe No. 5 v, Epstein, Case No. 08- 80381 (S.D. Ha. 2008); C.M.A. v. Epstein Case No. 08-80811 (S.D. Fla. 2008); Doe v. Epstein, Case No. 08-80893 (S.D. Fla. 2008); Doe No, 7 v. Epstein, Case No. 08-

June 10, 2009 but took no immediate action on E. W.'s Motion to Vacate Order Sealing Records and Uns

oe No. 71. Epstein, Case No. 08-80993 (S.D. Fla. 2008); Doe No. 6'. Epstein, Case No. 08-80994 (S.D. Fla. 2008); Doe II Epstein, Case No. 09-80469 (S.D. Ha. 2009); Doe No. 101 Epstein, Case No. 09-80591 (S.D. Fla. 2009); Doe No. 102'. Epstein, Case No. 09-80656 (S.D. Fla. 2009); Doe No. 81. Epstein, C

-W- C. e-pecli lay Robert r Jose e g Katherine W. Ezell Attorneys or Plaintiff Podhurst Orseck, P

pstein, 2009 WL 383332 (S.D. Fla. Feb. 12, 2009); Doe No. 31. Epstein 2009 WL 383330 (S.D. Fla. Feb. 12, 2009); Doe No. 41. Epstein, 2009 WL 383286 (S.D. Ha. Feb. 12, 2009); and Doe No. 5I. Epstein, 2009 WI, 383383 (S.D. Fla. Feb. 12, 2009); see also U.S. Scheidt, Slip Copy, 2010 WL 144837, fn. 1 (E.D.