Epstein Secrets

s and other leading scientists, including Robert W. Berliner, Christian B. Anfinsen, Daniel Steinber

rtunities they had to collaborate and network led to their later positions and successes. These unstructured oral interviews were tape-recorded by S.K., transcribed by NIH staff, and reviewed for accuracy by the interviewees. The transcripts arc archived at the Office of NIH History. Another auth

_52.s4- _ I citcheleof,e . z /4411 rrittir-in W.— - %Ns 64, it-clic-co ct‘ pr --Env. st _P i ri

5-5-, 42_ /0 ' 7124 1 7/#4 lia4Q.L.,-_,-, I? NOCC4 el/ ' a() TM( 40,A,a_z_ 7 / 7 0/0y 536 3“0( 10:VO I-- t)c ) I? ..." t "-÷i If . " S.K. I n---1.-- Frain /to..., ,yer.st- 05123..0 2: 5_, sl37 t --. ..- e AA*. .00, At . 5)4•W00* rater , ,.....R.. c— 17% Ap•-k._ ic:c..fr 3 e.

4/2009 Attorneys at RRA Bradley J. Edwards E.W., Doe v. Epstein — Letter from Bob Critton Work

ery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 02266 07/30/2009 Jacquie Johnson Bradley J. Edwards Epstein — Video Deposition of S.K. in NY Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence;

4/2009 Attorneys at RRA Bradley J. Edwards E.W., L.M. Doe v. Epstein — Letter from Bob Critton

ery of the admissible evidence; protected by privacy rights 02266 07/30/2009 Jacquie Johnson Bradley J. Edwards Epstein — Video Deposition of S.K. in NY Work product; attorney/client privilege; irrelevant and not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of the admissible evidence;