Epstein Secrets

d others, Razorback Funding, LLC, et al. v. Scott W. Rothstein, et al., Case No. 09-062943(19) (herei

rm, which enhanced the credibility of the purported investment opportunity; (d) Rothstein and other co-conspirators utilized funds obtained through the Ponzi Scheme to supplement and support the operation and activities of RRA, to expand Among the allegations in the Razorback Complaint regarding the Epstein cas

others, Razorback Funding, LLC, et al. v. Scott W. Rothstein, et al., Case No. 09-062943(19) (herei

irm, which enhanced the credibility of the purported investment opportunity; (d) Rothstein and other co-conspirators utilized funds obtained through the Ponzi Scheme to supplement and support the operation and activities of RRA, to expand RRA by the hiring of additional attorneys and support staff, to fund salar

d others, Razorback Funding, LLC, et al. v. Scott W. Rothstein, et al., Case No. 09-062943(19) (herei

rm, which enhanced the credibility of the purported investment opportunity; (d) Rothstein and other co-conspirators utilized funds obtained through the Ponzi Scheme to supplement and support the operation and activities of RRA, to expand RRA by the hiring of additional attorneys and support staff, to fund sala

your law firm in representing Jane Doe, M. and E.W. prior to joining RRA. ANSWER: Objection, releva

res on improper pleadings, discovery and motion practice by Edwards in the cases he was litigating against Epstein while a Partner at RRA and while the Ponzi Scheme was then in critical need of additional investment and about to unravel, as well as a subsequent Federal court order characterizing one of those mo

mplaint in Razorback Funding, LLC, et aL v. Scott W. Rothstein, et aL, Case No. 09- 062943(19); see De

ews outlets also reported at that time that the Florida Bar had begun actively investigating dozens of attorneys employed by RRA in connection with the Ponzi Scheme. [Cite Epstein Affidavit]; Miami Herald, Scott Rothstein Scandal: Scott Rothstein Partners Probed (January 14, 2010)("The Florida Bar is investigat

others, Razorback Funding, LLC, et al. v. Scott W. Rothstein, et al, Case No. 09-062943(19) (herein

Razorback Complaint that the Epstein Cases were being deliberately misused for purposes unrelated to the litigation in order to lure investors into the Ponzi Scheme is the fact that on July 24, 2009, Edwards filed a two hundred thirty-four (234) page, one fifty-six (156) count federal complaint against me on be

others, Razorback Funding, LLC, et al. v. Scott W. Rothstein, et al., Case No. 09-062943(19) (herei

rm, which enhanced the credibility of the purported investment opportunity; (d) Rothstein and other co- conspirators utilized funds obtained through the Ponzi Scheme to supplement and support the operation and activities of RRA, to expand RRA by the hiring of additional attorneys and support staff, to fund salar

Complaint; (2) the criminal proceedings of Scott W. Rothstein and Debra Villegas;' (3) the affidavit

tody. [D.E. 106 at '68-69]. At Rothstein's sentencing, Judge James I. Cohn made several findings regarding the role that RRA played in facilitating the Ponzi Scheme. In particular he noted that Millis case is about the selling of fake financial products. The marketing, however, was anything but simple. It was so

n 2 EFTA00583953 Funding, LLC, et aL v. Scott W. Rothstein, et at, Case No. 09-062943(19); see Dep

time that Rothstein had been disbarred and the Florida Bar had begun actively investigating dozens of attorneys employed by RRA in connection with the Ponzi Scheme. [Cite Epstein Affidavit]; Miami Herald, Scott Rothstein Scandal: Scott Rothstein Partners Probed (January 14, 2010)("The Florida Bar is investigati

ur law firm in representing Jane Doe, L.M. and E.W. prior to joining RRA. ANSWER: Objection, releva

res on improper pleadings, discovery and motion practice by Edwards in the cases he was litigating against Epstein while a Partner at RRA and while the Ponzi Scheme was then in critical need of additional investment and about to unravel, as well as a subsequent Federal court order characterizing one of those mo