Epstein Secrets

d others, Razorback Funding, LLC, et al. v. Scott W. Rothstein, et al., Case No. 09-062943(19) (herei

relevant because the probable cause determination is controlled by the facts relied upon by Epstein at the time he filed his complaint. See Gill v. Kostroff, 82 F.Supp. 2d 1354, 1364 (M.D. Fla. 2000) ("A determination of whether probable cause exists is based on the facts known by the defendant in the m

d others, Razorback Funding, LLC, et al. v. Scott W. Rothstein, et al., Case No. 09-062943(19) (herei

relevant because the probable cause determination is controlled by the facts relied upon by Epstein at the time he filed his complaint. See Gill v. Kostroff, 82 F.Supp. 2d at 1364 ("A determination of whether probable cause exists is based on the facts known by the defendant in the malicious prosecution

mplaint in Razorback Funding, LLC, et aL v. Scott W. Rothstein, et aL, Case No. 09- 062943(19); see De

. 2d 1162, 1166 (Fla.5th DCA 1984). "The standard for establishing probable cause in a civil action is extremely low and easily satisfied." Gill v. Kostroff, 82 F.Supp. 2d 1354, 1364. Even in the criminal context, such as when analyzing probable cause to support a search warrant, probable cause can be in

n 2 EFTA00583953 Funding, LLC, et aL v. Scott W. Rothstein, et at, Case No. 09-062943(19); see Dep

. 2d 1162, 1166 (Fla.5th DCA 1984). "The standard for establishing probable cause in a civil action is extremely low and easily satisfied." Gill v. Kostroff, 82 F.Supp. 2d 1354, 1364. Even in the criminal context, such as when analyzing probable cause to support a search warrant, probable cause can be in