Epstein Secrets

mplaint in Razorback Funding, LLC, et aL v. Scott W. Rothstein, et aL, Case No. 09- 062943(19); see De

support his motion, the opposing party must come forward with counter-evidence sufficient to reveal a genuine issue of material fact. Glasspoole v. Konover Constr. Corp. South, 787 So. 2d 937, 938 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). A failure of proof of any essential element of a party's cause of action necessarily renders

d others, Razorback Funding, LLC, et al. v. Scott W. Rothstein, et al., Case No. 09-062943(19) (herei

support his motion, the opposing party must come forward with counter-evidence sufficient to reveal a genuine issue of material fact. Glasspoole v. Konover Constr. Corp. South, 787 So. 2d 937, 938 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). A complete failure of proof of any essential element of a party's cause of action necessaril

n 2 EFTA00583953 Funding, LLC, et aL v. Scott W. Rothstein, et at, Case No. 09-062943(19); see Dep

support his motion, the opposing party must come forward with counter-evidence sufficient to reveal a genuine issue of material fact. Glasspoole v. Konover Constr. Corp. South, 787 So. 2d 937, 938 (Fla. 4th DCA 2001). A failure of proof of any essential element of a party's cause of action necessarily renders