Epstein Secrets

15(b)(3) of the Federal Rules of CMI Procedure. W. Francis Ned his opposition to the Motion to Amend

L DB-SONY-0020020 EFTA 00167764 EFTA01295861 Page 2 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 93633, * PRIOR HISTORY: Carroll v. N. Shore Real Estate Corp. (In re Prosser), 2010 Bankr. LEXIS 1566 (Bankr. D.V.I., May 26, 2010) CASE SUMMARY: OVERVIEW: Appellant filed a notice of appeal from a decision of the bankruptc

effrey B. C. Moorhead, Christiansted, USVI; Mark W. Eckard, Groner & Eckard, P.C., Christiansted, USV

Islands, St. Thomas and St. John Division 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 79534 June 6, 2012, Decided June 6, 2012, Filed SUBSEQUENT HISTORY: Affirmed by Prosser v. Carroll (In re Prosser), 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 15853 (3d Cir. V.I., Aug. 1, 2013) For internal use only SDNY_GM_00059974 CONFIDENTIAL - PURSUAN

— — ST: ThallAS ESTATE NAZARETH "itmeRs) No. f RED HOOK QUARTER SAINT THOMAS VtRIEIH i of -nets BY SuRVEY:NAW-NPIVI DRAWN: MON-WR elliAteD: W. we, SCALE: li40/1 CATE: I .22-59 APPROVER FOR RECAvo ISMC Qun.01YOR _ DEFENDANT'S • EXHIBIT EFTA00805311 WARRANTY DEED Dad 2$4110F33242

rt is permitted to review the allegations in the complaint and matters of public record in reviewing a motion to dismiss. Finthank of Puerto Rico v. Prosser, No. SX-09-CV-520, 2015 WL 13579241, at *2 n. 3 (V.I. Super. June 22, 2015). EFTA00805273 Great St Jim, LLC, r Kjaer, el at Motion to Dismiss th