Epstein Secrets

T C EFTA00207304 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x IN RE APPLICATION TO QUASH SUBPOENAS TO DAILY NEWS, L.P., AND GEORGE RUSH x No. 10 M8-85 (LMM) SUPPLEMENTARY AFFIDAVIT OF GEORGE RUSH STATE OF NEW YORK ) ) ss.: COUNTY OF NEW YORK ) GEORGE RUSH, being duly sworn, depo

am admitted to practice before this Court. 2. I make this Declaration in further support of the motion of the Daily News and Daily News journalist George Rush for an Order pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 45(cX3XAXiii) quashing subpoenas ad testificanduni and duces twain served on than by plaintiff Jane Doe

reto as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of L.W. v. Knox County Bd. of Educ.. 36 Med. L. Rptr. 17

int in April 20O9, after EDWARDS joined RRA, the allegations against EPSTEIN in ■.'s complaint became even more salacious. In paragraph 12 of ■.'s Second Amended Complaint, ■. alleges among other things, that: "Jeffrey Epstein coerced, induced, or enticed . .the then minor Plaintiff to commit various acts of sexual

T C EFTA00612037 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK x IN RE APPLICATION TO QUASH SUBPOENAS TO DAILY NEWS, L.P., AND GEORGE RUSH x No. 10 M8-85 (LMM) SUPPLEMENTARY AFFIDAVIT OF GEORGE RUSH STATE OF NEW YORK ) ) ss.: COUNTY OF NEW YORK ) GEORGE RUSH, being duly sworn, depo

am admitted to practice before this Court. 2. I make this Declaration in further support of the motion of the Daily News and Daily News journalist George Rush for an Order pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 45(cX3XAXiii) quashing subpoenas ad testificanduni and duces twain served on than by plaintiff Jane Doe

reto as Exhibit B is a true and correct copy of L.W. v. Knox County Bd. of Educ.. 36 Med. L. Rptr. 17

int in April 20O9, after EDWARDS joined RRA, the allegations against EPSTEIN in ■.'s complaint became even more salacious. In paragraph 12 of ■.'s Second Amended Complaint, alleges among other things, that: "Jeffrey Epstein coerced, induced, or enticed . .the then minor Plaintiff to commit various acts of sexual mi

ch, FL 33401 VIA U.S. MAIL The Honorable Donald W. Hafele Palm Beach County Courthouse 205 N. Dixi

e like this one, "a case where the case had never been at issue." Serban, 148 So. 3d at 1291(quoting Labor Ready). Furthermore, Epstein's operative Second Amended Complaint, which had neither been answered nor defaulted, contained a "brand-new" count alleged in response to the trial court's order dismissing the prior a

nited States in United States of America v. Scott W. Rothstein Case No. 09-60331CR-Cohn, United State

aint in April 2009, after EDWARDS joined RRA, the allegations against EPSTEIN in <SL7 complaint became even more salacious. In paragraph 12 of .'s Second Amended Complaint, L.M. alleges among other things, that: "Jeffrey Epstein coerced, induced, or enticed . . .the then minor Plaintiff to commit various acts of sexu

ccident that young girls like his clients L. , E.W. and Jane Doe ended up in EPSTE1N's mansion where

and prosecute against El) ARDS and the pending, closely related counterclaims. FACTUAL BACKGROUND Plaintiff/Counterdefendant, EPSTEIN has filed a Second Amended Complaint against ED ARDS. The complaint challenges EDWARDS' professionalism as an attorney rep enting girls who had been sexually abused. In particular,

nited States in United States of America v. Scott W. Rothstein, Case No. 09-60331CR-Cohn, United Stat

int In April 2009, after EDWARDS Joined RRA, the allegations against EPSTEIN in ■.'s complaint became even more salacious. In paragraph 12 of ■.'s Second Amended Complaint, II. alleges among other things, that: "Jeffrey Epstein coerced, induced, or enticed . . .the then minor Plaintiff to commit various acts of sexu