Epstein Secrets

o deposition), and Mr. Edwards' clients (L.M., E.W. and Jane Doe). Source: Florida Standard Jury In

1, 1185 (Fla. 1977) ("It is recognized that malice may be inferred from the absence of probable cause. Adams v. WhiWeld, 290 So. 2d 49 (Fla. 1974); Duval Jewelry Co. v. Smith, 102 Fla. 717, 136 So. 878 (Fla. 1931). However, malice is not legally synonymous with the absence of probable cause. White v. Miami Home

d others, Razorback Funding, LLC, et al. v. Scott W. Rothstein, et al., Case No. 09-062943(19) (herei

the plaintiff; 3) its bona fide termination in favor of the plaintiff; 4) the absence of probable cause for the prosecution; 5) malice; 6) damages. Duval Jewelry Co. v. Smith, 102 Fla. 717, 136 So. 878, 880 (1931). The fourth element is at issue here. In Goldstein v. Sabella, 88 So. 2d 910 (Fla. 1956), the Supre

mplaint in Razorback Funding, LLC, et aL v. Scott W. Rothstein, et aL, Case No. 09- 062943(19); see De

the plaintiff; 3) its bona fide termination in favor of the plaintiff; 4) the absence of probable cause for the prosecution; 5) malice; 6) damages. Duval Jewelry Co. v. Smith, 102 Fla. 717, 136 So. 878, 880 (1931). The fourth element, the absence of probable cause, is at issue here. In Goldstein v. Sabella, 88 S

n 2 EFTA00583953 Funding, LLC, et aL v. Scott W. Rothstein, et at, Case No. 09-062943(19); see Dep

the plaintiff; 3) its bona fide termination in favor of the plaintiff; 4) the absence of probable cause for the prosecution; 5) malice; 6) damages. Duval Jewelry Co. v. Smith, 102 Fla. 717, 136 So. 878, 880 (1931). The fourth element, the absence of probable cause, is at issue here. In Goldstein v. Sabella, 88 S