Epstein Secrets

n planning a fraud, no privilege exists. Charles W. Ehrhardt, Florida Evidence § 502.7 (2000). The co

greement. Id. at 1001. The federal district court had overruled Epstein's counsel's privilege objections. Id. at 1002. On appeal, in relevant part, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals agreed with Edwards' waiver argument and held that Epstein's counsel had waived the work-product privilege as it relates to Edwards' former clients

For Jane Doe 101 (Via telephone) 5 KATHERINE W. EZELL, ESQ. 6 Podhurst Orseck Josefsberg 25 We

rt, f tomm 33113 Sol 316 EFTA00180359 Case 9:08-cv-80804-KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/21/2008 Page 7 of 100 To cement this point, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals has said that "[w 'hen [a] complaint does not claim a specific amount of damages, removal from state court is proper if it is facially apparent fro

••••••••••••••••••••• owe... Wei 0••••••••...••• W....MS WIN IMP •••••••• 7$ e1310 Ph. 561.682.090

GEM% FM1:433133 I of 311 EFTA00180412 Case 9:08-cv-80804-KAM Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 07/21/2008 Page 7 of 100 To cement this point, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals has said that "Ewlhen [a] complaint does not claim a specific amount of damages, removal from state court is proper if it is facially apparent from

tion. 3. Jane Doe #1 is a woman with initials C.W., and Jane Doe #2 is a woman with initials T.M. B

, that Epstein could've spent behind bars had he been prosecuted in the federal system. They're hoping that the correspondence, ordered released by the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals, will shed light on what they say is an unusually lenient deal. "I can say that I've been teaching criminal law for more than two decades and I hav