Epstein Secrets

knowing that she was under 18? JANE DOE #3 (IMI W.) A. Who is Jane Doe #3? Have you testified abou

t to seek that particular sentence does not change the fact that the sentence was available to the State and rejected in its discretion. Therefore, Petite's presumption that the State of Florida's prior prosecution of Mr. Epstein has vindicated the federal interest cannot be said to have been overcome

secution Agreement stated: "after an investigation of the offenses and Epstein's background, that the interest of the United States pursuant to the Petite policy will be served by the following procedure [contained in the Deferred Prosecution Agreement)." See e.g., September 17, 2007 email from M. Vill

very grateful. Respectfully Submitted. Kenneth W. Starr RFP MIA 000443 EFTA00208924 12/11/2007

y your Office: IT APPEARING, alter an inv.:30101km of the ulTenses and Upslein's background, that the interest of the United States pursuant to the Petite policy will be served by the hallowing procedure . . . Epstein understands that the United States Attorney has no authority to require the State At

very grateful. RespectIlilly Submitted. Kenneth W. Star• EFTA00214292 12/11/2007 11:37 FAX 004/0

your Office: IT APPEARING, after an investigation of the offenses and Epstein's background. that the interest of the United Stales pursuant to the Petite policy will be served by the following procedure ... Epstein understands that the United States Attorney has no authority to require the State Atto

Mr. This anangenuna does not put these alleged "victims" in the same position as they %mild have been had Mr. Epstein been convicted at trial .— in W. they an much better nit EFTA00176131 12/11/2007 11:44 FAX Z022/099 KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP R. Alexander Acosta December I I.2007 Page 19 Epstei

your Office: IT APPEARING, idler an invizligation of the offenses and Epstcin's background, thin the interest or the United Stales pursuant to the Petite policy will be served by the Following procedure ... Epstein understands that the United Stales Attorney has no authority to require the Slate Atto

vided to Bradley Edwards' three clients, T.M.. C.W., and S.R.' Your Affiant's letter to C.W. was prov

reement; and IT APPEARING, after an investigation of the offenses and Epstein's background, that the interest of' the United States pursuant to the Petite policy will be served by the following procedure; THEREFORE, on the authority of United States Attorney for the Southern District of Florida, pr

Department of Justice 950 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W. — Room 3266 Washington, D.C. 20530 Re: OPR Inve

e was insufficient evidence to charge him with any offense; (b) there was no basis for federal prosecution and that federal prosecution violated the Petite policy; (c) I had engaged in prosecutorial misconduct during the investigation and resolution of the matter; (d) Jeff Sloman had engaged in prosecu