Epstein Secrets

IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA 2 3 4 E.W., ) 5 ) Plaintiff, ) 6 ) vs )Case No. 502

76, and that was a decision of the Fifth District Court of Appeal, and I will quote headnote 3, "had the Petitioners brought their lawsuit against Ruzzo and the Board Room only under Section 769.09, evidence of Petitioner's past prostitution 8 including with the Board Room and their earnings 9 r

ourt they sit, is going to be entitled to a fair shake and a fair trial and entitled to the EFTA00776411 47 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 the Ballast vs. Ruzzo case. For the record, the citation is 703 So.2d. 1076, and that was a decision of the Fifth District Court of Appeal, and I will quote headnote 3,

it of certior- ari. The District Court of Appeal, W. Sharp, .1., held that evidence of plaintiffs' pa

compelled to disclose intimate details of their sexu- al history. We decline to issue the writ of certiorari. Balas and Shumate filed suit against Ruzzo and Ex- ec, Inc., doing business as "The Boardroom." Ac- cording to Balas and Shumate, The Boardroom op- erates ostensibly as *1077 a leisure spa but

writ of certiorari to review certain portions of the lower court's order which granted, in part, a motion to compel discovery filed by respondents Ruzzo and Exec., Inc. Petitioners argue that those portions de- part from the essential requirements of law and will cause them irreparable harm because

it of certior- ari. The District Court of Appeal, W. Sharp, J., held that evidence of plaintiffs' pas

writ of certiorari to review certain portions of the lower court's order which granted, in part, a motion to compel discovery filed by respondents Ruzzo and Exec., Inc. Petitioners argue that those portions de- part from the essential requirements of law and will cause them irreparable harm because

compelled to disclose intimate details of their sexu- al history. We decline to issue the writ of certiorari. Bales and Shumate filed suit against Ruzzo and Ex- ec, Inc., doing business as "The Boardroom." Ac- cording to Batas and Shumate, The Boardroom op- erates ostensibly as *1077 a leisure spa but

p., 2008 WL 1777744 (M.D. Fla. 2008); Trenary v. Bush Entertainment Corp., 2006 WL 3333621 (M.D. Fla. 2

lanation for why victim exhibited behavioral manifestations of sexually abused child.). 14. In further support of Defendant's motion, See Balas v. Ruzzo, 703 So.2d 1076 (Fla. 5th DCA 1997), rev. denied, 719 So.2d 286 (Fla. 1998), as it is on point to the discovery issues in this action, and the rele