Epstein Secrets

e disturbance stemmed from. I was told by Officer W. Silva that Epstein, Jeffrey I/M# 76318-054 has a

^8 <unassigned> 12 Alone, K 11 SOUTH tt2 12 Bonhomme, REAR GATE 8 Keeling, M OSP di 2 Tearnoh, g $ SANITATION OFF 2 Clarke, d VISIT Mt 9 Fletcher, R VISIT #2 "13 Detonate, d $ OT 8 Leatham, k $ 12 Cohen. a $ VISIT 03 9 Mcpherson-ender "Special AssIgnments"" EPO OFFICE 8 West r$ ESCOR

on SUBJECT: Inmate Epstein reg# 76318-054 FROM: W. Silva, Senior Officer On July 23, 2019 at approx

2 liar's, K 12 $onhomme. G REAR GATE 8 Kezains, OSP #1 SANITATION OFF 2 Tearr.oh. g $ 2 Crarke, d $ 8 Leathern, k $ 12 Cohen, $ VISIT #1 9 Fletcher, R VISIT #2 Outonezic. d OT VISIT #3 9 Mcpherson-antler 'Special Assignments' EPO OFFICE 8 West, r $ ESCORT OFF #1 8 Hawkins, a $ ESCORT O

eiPfif t Q-39) 49,11- ierrs-r-"' Idc (a4G)Rso W. - Cingero- '15°4 1 ?et Ow)) tr542- 34/ - % 7 -

Doctor, t Akparanta, c Cappiello..1 Connell, T Darden S Dubenabc. d S Albanese, P Clarke, d Covington. T Owls. C Durant. j $ Eiusssaing 5 Fletcher, R Hawkins. a 5 Kilpatrick. a 5 Mcpherson•ander Ortiz. day 5 Petrowsld. r 5 Rice, m 5 Royal, V Shivers, k $ Mora, J Ie1 claw. M Gorales, A

2 TO: Operations Lie gaunt, LT Anderson FROM: W. Silva, Senior Officer perliZiiir SUBJECT: Inmate

•2 He, Y OT **13 <unassigned> 12 A are, K 11 SOUTH #2 12 Bonhomme, G REAR GATE 8 Kearns. M OSP #1 SANITATION OFF 2 Clarke, d $ VISIT #1 9 Fletcher, R VISIT #2 -1) Dubenezic. d $ OT VISIT #3 9 Mcpherson-ander ""Special AssIgnments"" EPO OFFICE 8 West. r $ ESCORT OFF #1 8 Hawkins, a $ E

of some victims to speak at sentencing. ! The federal rules can no longer leave victims unmentioned. In October 2004, Congress passed and President Bush signed into law the Scott Campbell, Stephanie Roper, Wendy Preston, Louarna Gillis, and Nila Lynn Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). ? The CVRA transf

unmentioned. In October 2004, Congress passed and President Bush signed into law the Scott Campbell, Stephanie Rop

vin v. Dowd, 366 U.S. 717 (1961) (holding that prisoner should have been granted change of venue where pre-trial publicity caused prejudice). But cf. Fletcher, supra note 155, at 252 (calling for abolition of a defendant's right to change venue because it "is, in effect, to accord the defense a whole peremp