Back to Network
3
Shared Docs
3
Same-Page
6 / 3
Mentions
Document Mentions (3 shared documents)
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
ble and triple hearsay directed toward filing charges against a defendant named See A.6 (Palm Beach Police Department - Probable Cause Affidavit of J. Recarey, dated May 1, 2006). Furthermore, the Florida State Attorney msly rejected the claims asserted in the police affidavit (which sought to charge as
lice Department - Probable Cause Affidavit of J. Recarey, dated May 1, 2006). Furthermore, the Florida Sta
rd's Recommendation Could Not Be Proven By Clear and Convincing Evidence. 20 B. The Court Improperly Relied on the Board's Recommendation Where the Facts Cited Therein Were Disputed and No Further Evidence Was Presented. 25 C. Determining Appellant To Be a Level 3 Offender Based on Factors That Were Not Proven
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
hearsay directed toward filing charges against a defendant named Sarah Kellen. See A.6 (Palm Beach Police Department - Probable Cause Affidavit of J. Recarey, dated May 1, 2006). Furthermore, the Florida State Attorney expressly rejected the claims asserted in the police affidavit (which sought to charge
lice Department - Probable Cause Affidavit of J. Recarey, dated May 1, 2006). Furthermore, the Florida Sta
rd's Recommendation Could Not Be Proven By Clear and Convincing Evidence. 20 B. The Court Improperly Relied on the Board's Recommendation Where the Facts Cited Therein Were Disputed and No Further Evidence Was Presented. 25 C. Determining Appellant To Be a Level 3 Offender Based on Factors That Were Not Proven
3 mentions1 same-page
Page ?Same page
t submitted by police to the Florida prosecutor. See A.65 (Board Recommendation); A.6 (Palm Beach Police Department - Probable Cause Affidavit of J. Recarey, dated May 1, 2006). The allegations, even when aggregated, were not deemed by the Florida prosecutor who reviewed them to constitute sufficient "p
lice Department - Probable Cause Affidavit of J. Recarey, dated May 1, 2006). The allegations, even when
rd's Recommendation Could Not Be Proven By Clear and Convincing Evidence. 20 B. The Court Improperly Relied on the Board's Recommendation Where the Facts Cited Therein Were Disputed and No Further Evidence Was Presented. 25 C. Determining Appellant To Be a Level 3 Offender Based on Factors That Were Not Proven
Sponsored
Mutual Connections (134)
Entities connected to both Joe Recarey and the Facts Cited Therein
Jeffrey Epstein
PERSON293 w/ Joe·4 w/ the
George W. Bush
PERSON109 w/ Joe·4 w/ the
JG
Jack Goldberger
PERSON104 w/ Joe·4 w/ the
New York
LOCATION63 w/ Joe·4 w/ the
MW
Martin Weinberg
PERSON60 w/ Joe·4 w/ the
Jay Lefkowitz
PERSON57 w/ Joe·4 w/ the
Scarlett Johansson
PERSON53 w/ Joe·4 w/ the
U.S. Virgin Islands
LOCATION48 w/ Joe·4 w/ the
Bill Richardson
PERSON44 w/ Joe·4 w/ the
New York City
LOCATION44 w/ Joe·4 w/ the
Adriana Ross
PERSON38 w/ Joe·4 w/ the
Supreme Court
ORGANIZATION30 w/ Joe·4 w/ the
New York State
LOCATION31 w/ Joe·2 w/ the
Stephen Hawking
PERSON31 w/ Joe·2 w/ the
Palm Beach Police
ORGANIZATION28 w/ Joe·4 w/ the
Kirkland & Ellis LLP
ORGANIZATION27 w/ Joe·3 w/ the
North Carolina
LOCATION20 w/ Joe·2 w/ the
LB
Lanna Belohlavek
PERSON19 w/ Joe·2 w/ the
Florida State
ORGANIZATION16 w/ Joe·4 w/ the
Sarah Ferguson
PERSON16 w/ Joe·4 w/ the