Epstein Secrets

estigation involved intent with many of the same witnesses. We are aware that at least one federal interview 1 ) was recorded. We understand that Detective Recarcy provided his police report and certain affidavits to the federal authorities but did not provide the actual witness statements of the taped intervie

ftPI): told me to say I was IS because said . . . if you're not then he [Epstein' won't really let you in his house. So I said I was Ir. Detective Recarey. however. largely ignored these critical admissions in his Police Report and Probable Cause Affidavit. Q: At any time. did he speak to you and does

Beach Police Department's probable cause affidavit has never been filed with the Court. If, in fact, you are referring to the Ex Pane Declaration of Joseph Recarey that was filed in response to the motion to quash the grand jury subpoena, it was filed both under seal and er pane, so no one should have access t

lty Hiccintakc wcwouniMilacOrn Ikcember I I. 2007 O051 530-6444 I lonomble R. Alexander Acosta United States Attorney United States Attorney's Unice Re: Jeffrey Epstein Dear Alex: As we discussed during our telephone conversations on both Friday and Monday (yesterday), we arc submitting two s

aw police reports of the investigation (including Detective Recarey's unedited written reports of witness statements

Jury's indictment, the Chief took the unprecedented step of releasing his Department's raw police reports of the investigation (including Detective Recarey's unedited written reports of witness statements and witness identification information), that were later proven to be highly inaccurate transcript

lye Fihlr 'Ibis letter briellk supplements our pi im submission to you dated May 19. 21)(1S. In dial coMmunication. we urgently requeNied that your Unice conduct an independent review of the proposed ledcral prey .:Minn of our clion. .lei(rey Epstein. The dual reasons for our request that you review

tried to hide something from the reviewers is false. I also take issue with the duplicity of stating that we must accept as true those parts of the Recarey reports and witness statements that you like and we must accept as false those parts that you do not like. You and your co-counsel also impressed u

:411i, Jny P I ntovntz, P.G. 10 Call Writer DIcocIIy VIA FACSIMILE Honorable R. Alexander Acosta United States Attorney United States Attorney's Unice Southern District of Florida Miami. FI, 33132 Dear Alex: New Yolk, Now Yutk 1002?•4611 www.kltklertt.COrn December 1 1. 2007 Re: Jeffrey Epste

Itmorahlt: R. Alexander Acosta December 17, 2007 Page 2 which includes but k not limited to Ms. testimony: the witness transcripts: the tainted Detective Kecarey reports: and our prior submissions. In light of the concerns we raised and the evidence we discussed al the December 14 meeting, we am firmly persua

st as rigorous a standard of certainty and clarity to your Office's indictment than to a state statute. even one that is pail of a deal made by your Unice. It would he unseemly in the extreme fur your Office to apply a more permissive standard to its own work than to a state statute. We believe stron