Epstein Secrets

tz. Fa As explained in the Declaration of Joseph Recarey, Epstein knew of the state investigation by the f

ershowitz. Fa As explained in the Declaration of Joseph Recarey, Epstein knew of the state investigation by the f

each, FL 33401 Telephone: Facsimile: CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on July , 2007, the foregoing document and the Declaration of Joseph Recarey will be served via hand delivery on Attorney Roy Black, counsel for Jeffrey Epstein. The same documents will be served on William Richey, counsel fo

tes in evaluating that claim, but Epstein has objected to the production of those documents. F.I 1Although unpublished, the case of United States v. Hunter , 1995 WL 12513 (N.D. III. Jan. 6, 1995), contains facts similar to the ones at bar and gives a detailed analysis of the applicability of the attorn

tz. Fa As explained in the Declaration of Joseph Recarey, Epstein knew of the state investigation by the f

ershowitz. Fa As explained in the Declaration of Joseph Recarey, Epstein knew of the state investigation by the f

500 South Australian Avenue, Suite 400 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on July , 2007, the foregoing document and the Declaration of Joseph Recarey will be served via hand delivery on Attorney Roy Black, counsel for Jeffrey Epstein. The same documents will be served on William Richey, counsel fo

tates in evaluating that claim, but Epstein has objected to the production of those documents. F.I 1Although unpublished, the case of United States' Hunter , 1995 WL 12513 (N.D. III. Jan. 6, 1995), contains facts similar to the ones at bar and gives a detailed analysis of the applicability of the attorn

earch of 358 El Brillo, as well as all evidence derived from the search, both physical and testimonial. In addition, the affidavit prepared by Det. Recarey in support of the search warrant is replete with material misstatements and omissions which, if not intentional, at a minimum, were made with reckl

gation was initiated, namely by Palm Beach Police Detective Recarey. Although Det. Recarey's questionable actions un

d 84, 87-88 (D.Me. 2003)(warrant to search computers which contained no limitations on the search was unconstitutionally overbroad); United States. Hunter, 13 F.Supp.2d 574, 584 (D.Vt. 1998)(section of warrant which authorized seizure of all computers, all computer storage devices, and all computer so

earch of 358 El Brillo, as well as all evidence derived from the search, both physical and testimonial. In addition, the affidavit prepared by Det. Recarey in support of the search warrant is replete with material misstatements and omissions which, if not intentional, at a minimum, were made with reckl

gation was initiated, namely by Palm Beach Police Detective Recarey. Although Det. Recarey's questionable actions un

d 84, 87-88 (D.Me. 2003Xwarrant to search computers which contained no limitations on the search was unconstitutionally overbroad); United States'. Hunter, 13 F.Supp.2d 574, 584 (D.Vt. I 998)(section of warrant which authorized seizure of all computers, all computer storage devices, and all computer s

DATE OF BIRTH HABITUAL OFFENDER: YES NO MICA VICTIM RELATED / ACQUAINTED WITH DEFENDANT? AGENCY CASE NUMBER: 05.368 (I ) LEAD OFFICER: Det. Joe Recaery AGENCY: PALM BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT CURRENT SHIFT HOURS: 8 am TO 5 pm YES /IX NO PHONE NUMBER: DAYS OFF: LEAVE / SHIFT CHANGE INFO

sa Fon.o kcit,45,14. VEHICLE TOW RECEIPT OTHER ATTACHMENTS INCLUDE: INITIAL FOR COMPLETENESS: JR OMCER 7915 050106 ID! IDI DELIVERED BY: Recarev r%Wle n crizir RECEIVED, STATE ATTORNEY'S OFFICE ON: Bot.. .V.‘i DATE S -LA -c) DATE TO EFTA00231964 tu > ,EPFLOISIOICIA6,010 d a 06TS

L 1 I I Juvenile Referral Report 2 N T A 4 Reltalel lot Cepa i---1 ,,,,A,...E. n Agency ORl Number FLOI5i0a0.6L0,0 Agency Name [Agra? Report Hunter (N.TA:s ode) PALM BEACH POLICE DEPARTMENT 7 Liall _t H f i i _L 1(1 i 1) ft r Tyre 0 I. Felony 0 3 lAselerneanw C S. Oronarme N Wagon

search of 358 El Brilb, as well as all evidence derived from the search, both physical and testimonial. In addition, the affidavit prepared by Det. Recarey in support of the search warrant is replete with material misstatements and omissions which, if not intentional, at a minimum, were made with reckl

46111.2d 84, 87-88 (D.Me. 2003Xwarrant to search computers which contained tations on the search was unconstitutionally overbroad); United States Hunter, 13 .2d 574, 584 (D.Vt. I998Xsection of warrant which authorized seizure of all computers, all computer storage devices, and all computer software