Epstein Secrets

ated a new case number or if they're included in this. It seems like it probably generated a new case number but 1 can't say for sure. But Detective; Recarey would know. Q Okay. All right. Would all of the potential victims,that wcrc being investigated by your department prior to let's say July of2006, hav

ciates 56'1-833-7811 CA/ Aronberg-000800 FILED: PALM BEACH COUNTY, FL, JOSEPH ABRUZZO, CLERK. 3/28/2023 2:22:44 PM Page 149: 1 conversationwith Detective Recarey about this, 2 whether he said anything directly to you that she ■3 was removed as opposed to. removing:herself 4 voluntarily from the case? 5 MR. CRI

firmed before me this lsl day of May, 2006 by Det Joe Recarey, who is personally known to me. Signature of Poli

Q Ifyou turn to page 79, it appears that; on 3 -the dale of.February 16, 2006, there's a meeting 4 that takes place between the investigator Joseph 5 Recafey and two women, Joanna Harrison and.a 6 Victoria Bean. Do you see that? 7 MR. CRITTON: Are we at 79? 8 MR. KUVIN: Yeah. 9 THE. WITNESS: Yes, 10 BY MR.

But it appears from this inforrna_tion here that these i:\vo, girls were paid for· sexual .contact with Mr:. Epstein, at least .accorging to what Detectiye Recarey investigated. Were there any additional investigations ongoing regarding allegations of ·prosGti,ition at thf home? • MR. CRITTON: Form. Page 1

endant was a flight risk because her knowledge of the seriousness ofthe charges against her gave her a strong incentive to abscond); United States v. Townsend, 897 F.2d 989, 995 (9th Cir. 1990) (“Facing the much graver penalties possible under the present indictment, the defendants have an even greater ince

MENT ime: 15:01:37 Page: 82 Incident Report Program: CMS301L 1************************NARRATIVE # 42 ********* ***************** Reported By: RECARSY, JOSEPH 4/14/06 Entered By.: ALTOMARO, NICKIE A. 4/18/06 The Grand Jury Subpoenas were personally served to the individuals they were issued to.

dant was a flight risk because her knowledge of the seriousness of the charges against her gave her a strong incentive to abscond); United States v. Townsend, 897 F.2d 989, 995 (9th Cir. 1990) ("Facing the much graver penalties possible under the present indictment, the defendants have an even greater in

MENT ime: 15:01:37 Page: 82 Incident Report Program: CMS301L 1************************NARRATIVE # 42 ********* ***************** Reported By: RECARSY, JOSEPH 4/14/06 Entered By.: ALTOMARO, NICKIE A. 4/18/06 The Grand Jury Subpoenas were personally served to the individuals they were issued to.

dant was a flight risk because her knowledge of the seriousness of the charges against her gave her a strong incentive to abscond); United States v. Townsend, 897 F.2d 989, 995 (9th Cir. 1990) ("Facing the much graver penalties possible under the present indictment, the defendants have an even greater in

MENT ime: 15:01:37 Page: 82 Incident Report Program: CMS301L 1************************NARRATIVE # 42 ********* ***************** Reported By: RECARSY, JOSEPH 4/14/06 Entered By.: ALTOMARO, NICKIE A. 4/18/06 The Grand Jury Subpoenas were personally served to the individuals they were issued to.

dant was a flight risk because her knowledge of the seriousness of the charges against her gave her a strong incentive to abscond); United States v. Townsend, 897 F.2d 989, 995 (9th Cir. 1990) ("Facing the much graver penalties possible under the present indictment, the defendants have an even greater in

MENT ime: 15:01:37 Page: 82 Incident Report Program: CMS301L 1************************NARRATIVE # 42 ********* ***************** Reported By: RECARSY, JOSEPH 4/14/06 Entered By.: ALTOMARO, NICKIE A. 4/18/06 The Grand Jury Subpoenas were personally served to the individuals they were issued to.

dant was a flight risk because her knowledge of the seriousness of the charges against her gave her a strong incentive to abscond); United States v. Townsend, 897 F.2d 989, 995 (9th Cir. 1990) ("Facing the much graver penalties possible under the present indictment, the defendants have an even greater in

MENT ime: 15:01:37 Page: 82 Incident Report Program: CMS301L 1************************NARRATIVE # 42 ********* ***************** Reported By: RECARSY, JOSEPH 4/14/06 Entered By.: ALTOMARO, NICKIE A. 4/18/06 The Grand Jury Subpoenas were personally served to the individuals they were issued to.

dant was a flight risk because her knowledge of the seriousness of the charges against her gave her a strong incentive to abscond); United States v. Townsend, 897 F.2d 989, 995 (9th Cir. 1990) ("Facing the much graver penalties possible under the present indictment, the defendants have an even greater in

MENT ime: 15:01:37 Page: 82 Incident Report Program: CMS301L 1************************NARRATIVE # 42 ********* ***************** Reported By: RECARSY, JOSEPH 4/14/06 Entered By.: ALTOMARO, NICKIE A. 4/18/06 The Grand Jury Subpoenas were personally served to the individuals they were issued to.

dant was a flight risk because her knowledge of the seriousness of the charges against her gave her a strong incentive to abscond); United States v. Townsend, 897 F.2d 989, 995 (9th Cir. 1990) ("Facing the much graver penalties possible under the present indictment, the defendants have an even greater in

MENT ime: 15:01:37 Page: 82 Incident Report Program: CMS301L 1************************NARRATIVE # 42 ********* ***************** Reported By: RECARSY, JOSEPH 4/14/06 Entered By.: ALTOMARO, NICKIE A. 4/18/06 The Grand Jury Subpoenas were personally served to the individuals they were issued to.

dant was a flight risk because her knowledge of the seriousness of the charges against her gave her a strong incentive to abscond); United States v. Townsend, 897 F.2d 989, 995 (9th Cir. 1990) ("Facing the much graver penalties possible under the present indictment, the defendants have an even greater in

MENT ime: 15:01:37 Page: 82 Incident Report Program: CMS301L 1************************NARRATIVE # 42 ********* ***************** Reported By: RECARSY, JOSEPH 4/14/06 Entered By.: ALTOMARO, NICKIE A. 4/18/06 The Grand Jury Subpoenas were personally served to the individuals they were issued to.

dant was a flight risk because her knowledge of the seriousness of the charges against her gave her a strong incentive to abscond); United States v. Townsend, 897 F.2d 989, 995 (9th Cir. 1990) ("Facing the much graver penalties possible under the present indictment, the defendants have an even greater in

MENT ime: 15:01:37 Page: 82 Incident Report Program: CMS301L 1************************NARRATIVE # 42 ********* ***************** Reported By: RECARSY, JOSEPH 4/14/06 Entered By.: ALTOMARO, NICKIE A. 4/18/06 The Grand Jury Subpoenas were personally served to the individuals they were issued to.

dant was a flight risk because her knowledge of the seriousness of the charges against her gave her a strong incentive to abscond); United States v. Townsend, 897 F.2d 989, 995 (9th Cir. 1990) ("Facing the much graver penalties possible under the present indictment, the defendants have an even greater in