Epstein Secrets

tz. Fa As explained in the Declaration of Joseph Recarey, Epstein knew of the state investigation by the f

ershowitz. Fa As explained in the Declaration of Joseph Recarey, Epstein knew of the state investigation by the f

each, FL 33401 Telephone: Facsimile: CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on July , 2007, the foregoing document and the Declaration of Joseph Recarey will be served via hand delivery on Attorney Roy Black, counsel for Jeffrey Epstein. The same documents will be served on William Richey, counsel fo

vilege are tested by refusing to answer specific questions. Davis , 636 F.2d at 1039. See also Nguyen v. Excel Corp. , 197 F.3d 200 (5th Cir. 1999); Clarke v. American Commerce Nat. Bank , 974 F.2d 127 (9th Cir. 1992); United States v. White , 950 F.2d 426, 430 (7th Cir. 1991). In his motion, Epstein

tz. Fa As explained in the Declaration of Joseph Recarey, Epstein knew of the state investigation by the f

ershowitz. Fa As explained in the Declaration of Joseph Recarey, Epstein knew of the state investigation by the f

500 South Australian Avenue, Suite 400 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I HEREBY CERTIFY that on July , 2007, the foregoing document and the Declaration of Joseph Recarey will be served via hand delivery on Attorney Roy Black, counsel for Jeffrey Epstein. The same documents will be served on William Richey, counsel fo

ee arrangements reached with that client," including the amount paid for legal services and the form of payment) EFTA00223008 (citation omitted); Clarke, American Commerce Nat'l Bank , 974 F.2d 127, 129 (9th Cir. 1992) ("the identity of the client, the amount of the fee, the identification of payment

earch of 358 El Brillo, as well as all evidence derived from the search, both physical and testimonial. In addition, the affidavit prepared by Det. Recarey in support of the search warrant is replete with material misstatements and omissions which, if not intentional, at a minimum, were made with reckl

gation was initiated, namely by Palm Beach Police Detective Recarey. Although Det. Recarey's questionable actions un

state interest is relatively minimal and United States treaty obligations have made federal intervention a high priority. See, e.g., United States 'Clarke, 159 Fed. Appx. 128, 2005 WL 3438434 (It ch Cir. 2005)(unpublished); United States I Strevell, 185 Fed. Appx. 841, 2005 WL 1697529 (11th Cir. 2006)

earch of 358 El Brillo, as well as all evidence derived from the search, both physical and testimonial. In addition, the affidavit prepared by Det. Recarey in support of the search warrant is replete with material misstatements and omissions which, if not intentional, at a minimum, were made with reckl

gation was initiated, namely by Palm Beach Police Detective Recarey. Although Det. Recarey's questionable actions un

tate interest is relatively minimal and United States treaty obligations have made federal intervention a high priority. See, e.g., United States v. Clarke, 159 Fed. Appx. 128, 2005 WL 3438434 (11th Cir. 2005)(unpublished); United States v. Strevell, 185 Fed. Appx. 841, 2005 WI, 1697529 (11th Cir. 2006

search of 358 El Brilb, as well as all evidence derived from the search, both physical and testimonial. In addition, the affidavit prepared by Det. Recarey in support of the search warrant is replete with material misstatements and omissions which, if not intentional, at a minimum, were made with reckl

state interest is relatively minimal and United States treaty obligations have made federal intervention a high priority. See, e.g., United States' Clarke, 159 Fed. Appx. 128, 2005 WL 3438434 (11th Cir. 2005Xunpublished); United StatesIStrevell, 185 Fed. Appx. 841, 2005 WI. 1697529 (II' Cir. 2006Xunpu