Epstein Secrets

estigation involved intent with many of the same witnesses. We are aware that at least one federal interview 1 ) was recorded. We understand that Detective Recarcy provided his police report and certain affidavits to the federal authorities but did not provide the actual witness statements of the taped intervie

ftPI): told me to say I was IS because said . . . if you're not then he [Epstein' won't really let you in his house. So I said I was Ir. Detective Recarey. however. largely ignored these critical admissions in his Police Report and Probable Cause Affidavit. Q: At any time. did he speak to you and does

Beach Police Department's probable cause affidavit has never been filed with the Court. If, in fact, you are referring to the Ex Pane Declaration of Joseph Recarey that was filed in response to the motion to quash the grand jury subpoena, it was filed both under seal and er pane, so no one should have access t

take positions during the investigation and negotiation of this matter that has led to unprecedented federal overreaching. In fact. Judge I lerben Stern's states " . . Alta federal authorities inappropriately involved themselves in the investigation by the state authorities and employed highly irregu

same things that you had asked me to do earlier is improper meddling in civil litigation. Much of your letter reiterates the challenges to Detective Recarey’s investigation that have HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012578 JAY P. LEFKOWITZ, Eso. DECEMBER 13, 2007 PAGE 3 OF 5 already been submitted to the Office on seve

Beach Police Department’s probable cause affidavit has never been filed with the Court. If, in fact, you are referring to the Ex Parte Declaration of Joseph Recarey that was filed in response to the motion to quash the grand jury subpoena, it was filed both under seal and ex parte, so no one should have access to

Much of your letter reiterates the challenges to Detective Recarey’s investigation that have HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_012578

| will be more than happy to do it, because it sounds !ike you all know more about it than |, but |'m happy to get affidavits from Mr. Pincus, Judge Stern, everybody else about what happened with this hearing today, because | know very [ittle about it. But my representations are what they are. MR. GOLD

R. Alexander Acosta December 17, 2007 Page 2 which includes but is not limited to Ms. testimony; the witness transcripts; the tainted Detective Recarey reports; and our prior su missions. In light of the concerns we raised and the evidence we discussed at the December 14 meeting, we are firmly persu

testimony; the witness transcripts; the tainted Detective Recarey reports; and our prior su missions. In light of t

he federal statutes would be applicable to Mr. Epstein's conduct, a lay person cannot be expected to make that determination. As confirmed by Judge Stern's conclusions regarding the application of § 2422(b), as well as the other relevant federal statutes, the conduct at issue is clearly not within the

arrested for drugs and was cooperating with 19 Detective Recarey against Epstein to get herself a better 20 deal

e to jail for drugs and car theft? 16 A. No, sir. 17 O. Someone who knows . 18 A. No. 19 Q. You don't know if he met with Detective 20 Recarey? 21 A. No, sir. 22 Q. How about INS 23 A. Yes, I remember. I know who that is. 24 Q. Did you ever speak to l about what 25 happened at

han happy 13 to do it, because it sounds like you all know more 14 about it than I -- but I'm happy to get affidavits 15 from Mr. Pincus, Judge Stern, everybody else about 16 what happened with this hearing today, because 17 know very little about it. But my representations 18 are what they a

ve been presented to you have been materially inaccurate. As you may know. the principal witnesses in this case were first interviewed by Detective Recarey of the Palm Reach Police Department (the "PRPIT) and other state law enlbrcement officers. These interviews (the "witness statement() were olden ta

n statement. EFTA00176117 12/11/2007 11:38 FAX a 008/099 R. Alexander Acosta December I 1. 2007 Page 5 .m.••••• 2 I Intl was interviewed by Detective Itecarey twice, once by telephone, and once in Nrson. The portions of the Police Roan at which we refer speci0cally cite the inperson interview of l kill as

e highly irregular and warrant a full review. We appreciate your willingness to consider the evidence. We respectfully request that you review Judge Stern's letter to Alan Dershowitz. faxed to you on December 7. 2007. in connection with the concerns we set forth in this submission. I. FEDF.RAL INVES

Itmorahlt: R. Alexander Acosta December 17, 2007 Page 2 which includes but k not limited to Ms. testimony: the witness transcripts: the tainted Detective Kecarey reports: and our prior submissions. In light of the concerns we raised and the evidence we discussed al the December 14 meeting, we am firmly persua

n of F 2422(b), as well as the other relevant federal statutes, the conduct at issue is clearly not within the predictable scope of 2422. See Judge Stern's 1.etter ("In stun. whatever sexual contact occurred, occurred face to face. without the use of an instrumentality of interstate commerce to persu