Epstein Secrets

and other documents in the Trustee's possession, respecting the subject matter of the subpoena previously served upon the Trustee related to L.M., Scott Rothstein, Brad Edwards and Jeffrey Epstein. . . Contemporaneous with the service and filing of the privilege log, Fanner Jaffe shall provide to a reputable

RICT OF FLORIDA Fort Lauderdale Division In re ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER, P.A. Debtor. Chapter 11 Case

3 In Bonner v. City of Prichard, 661 F.2d 1206 (I I th Cir.1981) (en banc), the Eleventh Circuit adopted as binding precedent all cases decided by the Fifth Circuit, prior to October I, 1981. 9 114428178.1 EFTA00793928 Case 09-34791-RBR Doc 6355 Filed 04/11/18 Page 10 of 17 adequately resolved by agreeme

ited Liability Company, by its manager, Bahia Property Management, LLC, aDelawarc Limited Liability Company, by its co-manager, Scott W. Rothstein; Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest in QTask; Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest in Broward Bank of Commerce; Scott W. Rothstein's equity interest in Bova Ristorante

se 0:09-cr-60331-JIC Document 1 Entered on FLSD Docket 12/01/2009 Page 26 of 36 (BA9) Toronto Dominion Bank, N.A. account 6860291266 in the name of Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler, P.A. which, on or about November 11, 2009, contained the approximate amount of $54,021.27; (BA10)Toronto Dominion Bank, N.A. acc

New York District Attorney. Sincerely, P. Le owitz, P.C. Cc: Martin G. Weinberg JPL/slm I Decisions of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit handed down prior to September 30, 1981, are binding as precedent in the Eleventh Circuit, Sag Bonner v. City of Prichard, Ala., 661 F.2d 1206, 1207

them, in securing their testimony or requiring 10 them to cooperate in any sense. 11 I cite to the Court the case of Coquina Investments v. 12 Rothstein, which I didn't realize until I was reading this last 13 night is ironic because the defendant in the Rothstein case is 14 Mr. Edwards' former pa

d. That's a Fifth Circuit case from 1995, in which a 14 bank officer was accused of dishonest and fraudulent acts and 15 kind of bogus loans, and the Fifth Circuit allowed Fifth 16 Amendment invocations from the loan recipients to be used 17 against him, reasoning that, well, in this kind of a case, the 18

control over them, in securing their testimony or requiring them to cooperate in any sense. I cite to the Court the case of Coquina Investments v. Rothstein, which I didn't realize until I was reading this last night is ironic because the defendant in the Rothstein case is Mr. Edwards' former partner, w

Maryland. That's a Fifth Circuit case from 1995, in which a bank officer was accused of dishonest and fraudulent acts and kind of bogus loans, and the Fifth Circuit allowed Fifth Amendment invocations from the loan recipients to be used against him, reasoning that, well, in this kind of a case, the collusion t

control over them, in securing their testimony or requiring them to cooperate in any sense. I cite to the Court the case of Coquina Investments v. Rothstein, which I didn't realize until I was reading this last night is ironic because the defendant in the Rothstein case is Mr. Edwards' former partner, w

of Maryland. That's a Fifth Circuit case from 1995, in which a bank officer was accused of dishonest and fraudulent acts and kind of bogus loans, and the Fifth Circuit allowed, Fifth Amendment invocations from the loan recipients to be used against him, reasoning that, well, in this kind of a case, the collusion t

16 32:7 risk 9:6 10:6,7 18:25 38:6 40:1041:6,11 risks 21:5 Robert 2:1,8 4:2 6:3 role 25:1317:7 Room 2:23 Rosenfeldt 1:17 rose-colored 11:16 Rothstein 1:17 HPR-CM-RNIR-F... 44:21 RPR-RMR-FCRR... 2:21 rule 39:9 42:13 rules 22:3 25:1 34:24 40:15 42:13 ruling 8:25 42:7 rulings 19:21 23:8 25:2

of a public court proceeding or the right to restitution. In her memorandum, petitioner relics upon In Re Dean, 527 F.3d 391 (5th Cir. 2008), where the Fifth Circuit held that the CVRA required the government to "confer in some reasonable way with the victims before ultimately exercising its broad discretion." Id

victims.” The victims sought appellate review in the Fifth Circuit.°’ There, the court concurred with the district c

ch Police Department: Police Case No. 05- 368(1) (May 1, 2006), available at http://goo.gl/fAPFw5; see also Statement of Undisputed Facts, Epstein v. Rothstein, No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG (Fla. Cir. Ct. Sept. 22, 2010), available at http://goo.gl/DzMbe8. 196 See supra notes 178-95 and accompanying text a

before charges have been filed, courts have uniformly agreed with the victims’ position. Perhaps the leading case to date to assess this question is the Fifth Circuit's decision in In re Dean. °° There, a wealthy corporate criminal defendant reached a generous plea deal with the Government - a deal that the Governmen

ach Police Department: Police Case No. 05-368(1) (May 1, 2006), available at http://goo.gl/fAPFw5; see also Statement of Undisputed Facts, Epstein v. Rothstein, No. 50 2009 CA 040800XXXXMBAG (Fla. Cir. Ct. Sept. 22, 2010), available at hitp:-//goo.gl/DzMbe8. 196 See supra notes 178-95 and accompanying text