Epstein Secrets

Filing # 62481523 E-Filed 10/05/2017 08:50:35 PM JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J, EDWARDS, Individually, and L.M., individually. Defendants. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN

50:35 PM JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J, EDWARDS, Individually

ant to which such payment was made. Include in 2 Christie v. Hixson, 358 So. 2d 859 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978); Ma

JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individu

JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually. Defendants. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH C

issible evidence" are legally impermissible. See Christie v. Hixson, 358 So. 2d 859 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978). Di

reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. b. None. 6. All fee sharing agreements between Bradley J. Edwards, RRA, or Scott W. Rothstein and/or any other attorney or investor relating to any aspect of any Plaintiff's case. ANSWER: Objection, relevance, not reasonably calculated to l

ent to his cause of action. Moreover, discovery relating to Edwards's financial incentives to join RRA and to engage in conduct in cooperation with Rothstein in support of RRA's illicit activities is most certainly relevant to Edward's allegations in this case and Epstein's defense of the same. Accordingl

bjections must be set forth with specificity. See Christie v. Hixson, 358 So. 2d 859 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978). D

COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, VS. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and III individually, Defendants. TRANSCRIPT OF HEARING PROCEEDINGS DATE TAKEN: December 17, 2

26f9-4cfa-bba3-4354ecd33a52 EFTA00598449 3 1 Thereupon, 2 the following proceedings began at 10:02 3 THE COURT: Okay. This is 4 Epstein vs. Rothstein. This is the motion of 5 the counterplaintiff for -- to add punitive 6 damages. I reviewed the materials you guys had 7 sent to me. I got the m

ause 1:20 6:19 9:13 causing 7:16 Center 2:9 certainly 6:3 CERTIFICA... 20:1 certify 20:8 change 15:9 check 13:6 chief 17:3 choice 4:13,14 Christine 1:22 20:7,17 circuit 1:1,1,17 10:14 circumstances 6:15 7:1 circumstantial 7:8 8:6,22 cited 19:7 civil 7:17 11:16 civilly 7:5 claim 8:9 12:

reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. b. None. 6. All fee sharing agreements between Bradley J. Edwards, RRA, or Scott W. Rothstein and/or any other attorney or investor relating to any aspect of any Plaintiff's case. ANSWER: Objection, relevance, not reasonably calculated to l

ent to his cause of action. Moreover, discovery relating to Edwards's financial incentives to join RRA and to engage in conduct in cooperation with Rothstein in support of RRA's illicit activities is most certainly relevant to Edward's allegations in this case and Epstein's defense of the same. Accordingl

bjections must be set forth with specificity. See Christie v. Hixson, 358 So. 2d 859 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978). D

reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. b. None. 6. All fee sharing agreements between Bradley J. Edwards, RRA, or Scott W. Rothstein and/or any other attorney or investor relating to any aspect of any Plaintiff's case. ANSWER: Objection, relevance, not reasonably calculated to l

nt to his causes of action. Moreover, discovery relating to Edwards's financial incentives to join RRA and to engage in conduct in cooperation with Rothstein in support of RRA's illicit activities is most certainly relevant to Edward's allegations in this case and Epstein's defense of the same. Accordingl

bjections must be set forth with specificity. See Christie v. Hixson, 358 So. 2d 859 (Fla. 4th DCA 1978). D

ave done for love Sponsored Attached at the hip! Christie Brinkley, 61, radiates as she and new boyfriend J

DESQUIRE HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015550 --- PAGE BREAK --- EXHIBIT J HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015551 --- PAGE BREAK --- JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, VS. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and L.M., individually, Defendants. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AN

.com Law Offices of Marc S. Nurik One E Broward Blvd., Suite 700 Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301 Phone: (954)-745-5849 Fax: (954)-745-3556 Attorneys for Scott Rothstein HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015553 --- PAGE BREAK --- Edwards adv. Epstein Case No.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG Notice of Filing Supplement HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_01555