Epstein Secrets

KR. SCAROLA: May I now to this podium now? JEFFREY EPSTEIN, biaintirs/countor -Defendant, vs 4 THE CO1RT: Sure. 'at. SCAROLA: Thank you, sir. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually; • Your 110nOr, have we decided what notions were BRADLEY EDWARDS, individually, , going to hoar? boranciants/countor -Plaintiffs

ng CO your Honor that 12 during a very CUTUICUOUSI period of CIAO these would I) the first notice we got of an Intent CO attempt. to to be the Rothstein fines, erployee. 14 use chose documents was March S. The first notice 14 KR. SMOLA: Yes, air. Let ne go through IS wo got of an intent CO attem

wards 3 directly from the Fourth Diatrict Court of Appeal, 4 has asked about and answered that are on this 4 RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company versus Calloway, and it s privilege log. There's over a hundred of then. 5 talks about the trial judge's ultimate 4 So this disk is not a di➢k of their privil

KR. SCAROLA: May I now to this podium now? JEFFREY EPSTEIN, biaintirs/countor -Defendant, vs 4 THE CWRT: Sure. 'at. SCAROLA: Thank you, sir. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually; • Your Honor, have we wowed what notions were BRADLEY EDWARDS, individually, boranciants/countor -Plaintiffs. , 10 going to hoa

ng CO your Honor that 12 during a very CUTUICUOUSI period of CIAO these would I) the first notice we got of an Intent CO attempt. to to be the Rothstein fines, erployee. 14 use chose documents was March S. The first notice 14 KR. SMOLA: Yes, air. Let ne go through IS wo got of an intent CO attem

wards 3 directly from the Fourth Diatrict Court of Appeal, 4 has asked about and answered that are on this 4 RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company versus Calloway, and it s privilege log. There's over a hundred of then. 5 talks about the trial judge's ultimate 4 So this disk is not a di➢k of their privil

KR. LINK: I understand. Your Honor, may I respected coach and former coach of the Heat -- a have one ninute to confer with appellate counsel to Scott Rothstein wan sitting on thin stuff. That's 7 ado sure there's nothing I need to do to preserve i not what happened hero. That's the point that I'm • this

an agreement. And 19 THE COUR?: I nay have font you. ?he 74,000 in our agreement, your court order says no 20 pages wore self-generated from the Rothstein firm: additional exhibits unless the parties agree. In 21 MR. LINK: Yes. And delivered by the trustee the pretrial stip Kr. scarola and I agree

em. • presentation. I often refer to a case that I printed directly from the Fourth District Court of Appeal, RJ Reynolds Tobacco Company versus Calloway, and it talks about the trial judge's ultimate So this disk is not a disk of their privileged docunents. It's a disk of 27,500 documents. And wha

o the Court, Jane Doe #3’s Response takes remarkable liberties in describing what is claimed to be the law to Court. For example, the Response quotes Calloway v. Westinghouse Elec. Corp., 115 F.R.D. 73, 74 (M.D. Ga. 1987) for the proposition that “a witness’ interest in his reputation alone . . . does not c

, agreed with this reading of the NPA in his Statement of Undisputed Fact during his own personal lawsuit against Jeffrey Epstein (Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and Bradley J. Edwards, lawsuit (Case no. 502009-CA- 040800)) in Palm Beach County Circuit Court. There, Edwards explained that these co- conspirator

against Jeffrey Epstein (Jeffrey Epstein v. Scott Rothstein and Bradley J. Edwards, lawsuit (Case no. 502009-