Epstein Secrets

Razorback Funding, LLC, et at, v. Scott W. Rothstein, et at Complex Litigation Division - Case No.: 09-062943 (19) Third Amended Complaint By ignoring evidence of the Principal Conspirators' miscondu

Plaintiffs have discovered, relative to Levin, Preve, and Banyon, that: a. an $8,000,000.00 wire transfer confirmation used by Levin, Preve, and Rothstein to induce Razorback's $32,000,000.00 payment was never received by RRA or TD Bank. In fact, the fictitious $8,000,000.00 wire is powerful evidence

and has not been returned. Specific examples of Gibraltar Bank's overt acts, assistance and/or omissions in furtherance of the conspiracy include: a. Rothstein learned early in his scheme that he could not convince wealthy investors to give him money unless he established relationships with financial insti

red a detailed list of amounts of exposure per account for the following investors: ABS, Ira Sochet and Investors Risk, Mel Lifshitz and EMESS; and Coquina, for which Rothstein responds that "[s]ince coquina exposure is so small . . . I am going to pay them personally so they have no loss . . . so barr

KR. SCAROLA: May I now to this podium now? JEFFREY EPSTEIN, biaintirs/countor -Defendant, vs 4 THE CO1RT: Sure. 'at. SCAROLA: Thank you, sir. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually; • Your 110nOr, have we decided what notions were BRADLEY EDWARDS, individually, , going to hoar? boranciants/countor -Plaintiffs

ng CO your Honor that 12 during a very CUTUICUOUSI period of CIAO these would I) the first notice we got of an Intent CO attempt. to to be the Rothstein fines, erployee. 14 use chose documents was March S. The first notice 14 KR. SMOLA: Yes, air. Let ne go through IS wo got of an intent CO attem

es chat you're aware 4 address, However, the protection that applies in a 5 of? 5 criminal proceeding does not apply in a civil 4 MR. SCAROLA: Coquina Is a Florida case, your , lawsuit when a person, based on the Fifth 7 Honor. 7 amendment, refuses to answer questions. And I know S THE COURT

KR. SCAROLA: May I now to this podium now? JEFFREY EPSTEIN, biaintirs/countor -Defendant, vs 4 THE CWRT: Sure. 'at. SCAROLA: Thank you, sir. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually; • Your Honor, have we wowed what notions were BRADLEY EDWARDS, individually, boranciants/countor -Plaintiffs. , 10 going to hoa

ng CO your Honor that 12 during a very CUTUICUOUSI period of CIAO these would I) the first notice we got of an Intent CO attempt. to to be the Rothstein fines, erployee. 14 use chose documents was March S. The first notice 14 KR. SMOLA: Yes, air. Let ne go through IS wo got of an intent CO attem

es chat you're aware 4 address, However, the protection that applies in a 5 of? 5 criminal proceeding does not apply in a civil 4 MR. SCAROLA: Coquina Is a Florida case, your , lawsuit when a person, based on the Fifth 7 Honor. 7 amendment, refuses to answer questions. And I know S THE COURT