Epstein Secrets

TEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA Case No. 50-2009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff. AMENDED NOTICE OF HEARING ON COURT'S TRIAL DOCKET (Adds Item N

EPSTEIN, Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individua

onal Limited Discovery, Evidentiary and Appointment of Special Master [Sealed] [D.E. 1252] 4/4/18 Epstein's Supplement and Specific Request for in Camera Review to Determine Relevance, Inapplicability and/or Waiver of Attorney-Client Privilege and Attorney Work Product With Regard to Sealed Documents [D.E.

Trial Exhibits 7.50 0.00 03/03/18 SJL Work on Response to Motion to B. Edwards' Compel re Request for Admissions; strategize re default against S. Rothstein and options to proceed with trial or seek to strike trial setting; work on preparations for special set hearings; work on trial preparations 7.30

/18 PVD [Ne -ci analysis of production re( 03/16/18 PVD [N locket for chronology of pri .ss. .vork on updating same 03/16/18 KBR le' or In Camera Review of " trict Court of Appeal de :arch re all r. 90.702, work-product pr inethical behavior, is; onse in Opposition to Pr eider from the Fo

0.00 Summary of Damages; work on Response to S. Rothstein's Motion to Dismiss; work on strategies 07/05/18

d federal case law cited in J. Epstein's Motion for Court to Declare Relevance and Privileged Nature of Documents and with Specific Request for in Camera Review to Determine Relevance, Inapplicability, and Waiver, Plaintiffs Response thereto, and our Supplement thereto on the issues of "issue injection' an