Epstein Secrets

UIT COURT OF THE 17TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO: 09-062943 07 RAZORBACK FUNDING, LLC, et al, Plaintiffs, vs. SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN, et al, Defendants. DAY 8 - AFTERNOON SESSION DEPOSITION OF SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN DATE TAKEN: TIME: PLACE: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 1:00 p.m

k was taken.) 11 (Whereupon, The Funds' Exhibit No. 261 was 12 marked for identification.) 13 BY MR. LAUER: 14 Q Okay. I am handing you, Mr. Rothstein, 15 Exhibit 261, which is a photostatic copy of Confidential 16 Settlement Agreement and Release. It bears production 17 PRODA 21183 through 21

22 answer that question. 23 They asked me about my history with other 24 investors, Thane Ritchie. I don't remember, again, 25 whether it was Legamaro or Podaras, one or both of them United Reporting, Inc. (954) 525- 2221 EFTA00314950 Page 2250 1 asked me about prior investor experience. 2

t I was used to dealing 6 with with some of the other investors. 9 I received e-mails from a number of the 10 different people and remember Mr. Legamaro writing to 11 me. I remember Mr. Podaras writing to me. I remember 12 Mr. Von Allmen writing to me. I remember meeting with 13 Mr. Von Allmen o

UIT COURT OF THE 17TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO: 09-062943 07 RAZORBACK FUNDING, LLC, et al, Plaintiffs, vs. SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN, et al, Defendants. DAY 8 - AFTERNOON SESSION DEPOSITION OF SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN DATE TAKEN: TIME: PLACE: Wednesday, December 21, 2011 1:00 p.m

k was taken.) 11 (Whereupon, The Funds' Exhibit No. 261 was 12 marked for identification.) 13 BY MR. LAUER: 14 Q Okay. I am handing you, Mr. Rothstein, 15 Exhibit 261, which is a photostatic copy of Confidential 16 Settlement Agreement and Release. It bears production 17 PRODA 21183 through 21

22 answer that question. 23 They asked me about my history with other 24 investors, Thane Ritchie. I don't remember, again, 25 whether it was Legamaro or Podaras, one or both of them United Reporting, Inc. (954) 525- 2221 EFTA_R1_00015709 EFTA01735049 Page 2250 1 asked me about prior investo

t I was used to dealing 8 with with some of the other investors. 9 I received e-mails from a number of the 10 different people and remember Mr. Legamaro writing to 11 me. I remember Mr. Podaras writing to me. I remember 12 Mr. Von Allmen writing to me. I remember meeting with 13 Mr. Von Allmen o

UIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO. 502009CA040800X.XXXMB-AG Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants. SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT The Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, ("Epstein"), by and thro

The Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned attorneys, files this action against the Defendants, Scott Rothstein, ("Rothstein") and Bradley J. Edwards ("Edwards") (collectively referred to as "Defendants") and alleges: INTRODUCTION This litigation has at its core a law fi

egarding causes of action against Epstein; g) Adler sent an email to Rothstein regarding causes of action against Epstein; h) Rothstein sent to Legamaro, counsel for the Investors, an email regarding the causes of action against Epstein. Based upon the foregoing, Rothstein received information from

es and a flight log displayed by Rothstein that allegedly contained the names of numerous celebrities who purportedly flew on Epstein aircraft. Mr. Legamaro and his client reviewed both the flight log and the case files in the offices of RRA. 18. The Epstein case files were displayed to potential inves

UIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CIVIL DIVISION CASE NO. 502009CA040800X.XXXMB-AG Judge David F. Crow JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Defendants. SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT The Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, ("Epstein"), by and thro

The Plaintiff, Jeffrey Epstein, ("Epstein"), by and through his undersigned attorneys, files this action against the Defendants, Scott Rothstein, ("Rothstein") and Bradley J. Edwards ("Edwards") (collectively referred to as "Defendants") and alleges: INTRODUCTION This litigation has at its core a law fi

egarding causes of action against Epstein; g) Adler sent an email to Rothstein regarding causes of action against Epstein; h) Rothstein sent to Legamaro, counsel for the Investors, an email regarding the causes of action against Epstein. Based upon the foregoing, Rothstein received information from

es and a flight log displayed by Rothstein that allegedly contained the names of numerous celebrities who purportedly flew on Epstein aircraft. Mr. Legamaro and his client reviewed both the flight log and the case files in the offices of RRA. 18. The Epstein case files were displayed to potential inves

UIT COURT OF THE 17TH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR BROWARD COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO: 09-062943 07 RAZORBACK FUNDING, LLC, et al, Plaintiffs, vs. SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN, et al, Defendants. DAY 1 - AFTERNOON SESSION DEPOSITION OF SCOTT ROTHSTEIN DATE TAKEN: TIME: PLACE: Monday, December 12, 2011 1:00 p.m. - 5:

FUNDING, LLC, et al, Plaintiffs, vs. SCOTT W. ROTHSTEIN, et al, Defendants. DAY 1 - AFTERNOON SESSION

And there were additional boxes and I did have people bring them to me. I don't remember who brought them to me, but yes. Q And do you recall Mr. Legamaro, what he did with respect to his review of those boxes of the cases? A I recall bringing the boxes in, the only real recollection I have of that

and E-Mail: Michelle Ganetis Fowler White Burnett One Financial Plaza 100 SE Third Avenue, 21° Floor Fort Lauderdale, FL 33394 Re: Epstein v. Rothstein Court No.: 2011 MR 000150 Our File No.: 7879 - 10001 Dear Michelle: Son 2700 33 WEST MONROt STREET CHICAGO. IL 60603-5404 1435 EAST 85TH AVD4A

the events surrounding the attempted service on Thane Ritchie. As you know, we originally believed that Mr. Ritchie could be served along with Mr. Legamaro at the address in Chicago. This process took several days longer than normal due to the court that signs such orders being dark on the day we filed,