Epstein Secrets

e to preserve the privileges of RRA's former clients. See Order Granting Motion for Protective Order, D.E. 672. 6. Epstein filed a lawsuit against Scott W. Rothstein, L.M.'s counsel Brad Edwards, and L.M. individually.3 Epstein has sought to prove up his meritless claims against Attorney Edwards and L.M., in par

re minors. 2 See Motion for Protective Order to Exclude Production of Privileged Documents and Testimony from Qtask, Inc. [D.E. 355]. 3 Epstein v. Rothstein, et aL, Case #09-CA-040800-MBAG, 15th Judicial Circuit in and for Palm Beach County, Florida. 4 Dep. Jeffrey Epstein, Epstein v. Rothstein, et al.,

er arising purely under state law claims filed in state court which are not before the Bankruptcy Court. Epstein seeks to perform an end run around the Circuit Court's proper exercise of its jurisdiction to adjudicate matters pending before it, including subpoenas issued from that court. Moreover, the honorable Ci

EAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT Appellate Case No.: LT Case No: 502009CA0408003OOOCMB AG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Petitioner/Plaintiff, v. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, Respondents/Defendants. EMERGENCY PETITION FOR WRIT OF MANDAMUS On Review of a Non-Final Ord

Epstein filed his initial Complaint in this action against Scott Rothstein, Bradley Edwards and L.M.'- Epstein alleged the following counts against Rothstein: a. (1) Violation of § 772,101 — Florida Civil Remedies for Criminal Practices Act b. (2) Violation of § 895.01 — Florida's RICO Act c. (3) Abuse

reversible error if this action proceeds to trial on March 13, 2018. Appellate Courts are Clean Strict Compliance with Rule 1.440 is Mandatory and the Circuit Court's Failure to Follow the Rule Warrants Mandamus Relief This Court, in particular, has spoken on the "mandatory" nature of the timing of Rule 1.440, an

ubstantial payments to other girls who he has abused rather than face trial on the civil suits that have been filed against him by other attorneys. Scott Rothstein 's Ponzi Scheme 15. From in or about 2005, through in or about November 2009, Scott Rothstein appears to have run a giant Ponzi scheme at his law fir

azorback Creditor's motion, the Court should make clear that it is not ruling on the numerous issues relating to 'Razorback Funding, LLC, et al. v. Rothstein, et al., Case # 09-062943 CACE 19, Circ. Crt. of the 17h Judicial Circuit in and for Broward County, Florida. EFTA00708293 Case 09-34791-RBR Doc

very matter arising purely under state law claims filed in state court. The Razorback Creditors in essence are seeking to perform an end run around the Circuit Court's proper exercise of its jurisdiction to adjudicate matters pending before it, including subpoenas issued from that court. For reasons of comity alone