er arising purely under state law claims filed in state court which are not before the Bankruptcy Court. Epstein seeks to perform an end run around the Circuit Court's proper exercise of its jurisdiction to adjudicate matters pending before it, including subpoenas issued from that court. Moreover, the honorable Ci

reversible error if this action proceeds to trial on March 13, 2018. Appellate Courts are Clean Strict Compliance with Rule 1.440 is Mandatory and the Circuit Court's Failure to Follow the Rule Warrants Mandamus Relief This Court, in particular, has spoken on the "mandatory" nature of the timing of Rule 1.440, an

very matter arising purely under state law claims filed in state court. The Razorback Creditors in essence are seeking to perform an end run around the Circuit Court's proper exercise of its jurisdiction to adjudicate matters pending before it, including subpoenas issued from that court. For reasons of comity alone