Epstein Secrets

ein v. Edwards. Case No. 502009 CA040800XXXXMB AG The Plaintiff Epstein commenced an action on December 7, 2009 seeking damages against Defendants, Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards, and LM,' based on an alleged illegal Ponzi scheme by the Defendants, and the Plaintiff believes others as well, to market inves

, 2009 seeking damages against Defendants, Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards, and LM,' based on an alleged

o market investments to outside investors in lawsuits brought against Epstein by a number of Plaintiffs, represented by the now defunct Law Firm of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt & Adler, P.A. ("RRA"). Some of the lawsuits were transferred to a newly formed firm of Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, PL ("Farmer Jaffe"). E

, 2009 seeking damages against Defendants, Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards, and LM,' based on an alleged

ein v. Edwards. Case No. 502009 CA040800XXXXMB AG The Plaintiff Epstein commenced an action on December 7, 2009 seeking damages against Defendants, Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards, and LM,' based on an alleged illegal Ponzi scheme by the Defendants, and the Plaintiff believes others as well, to market inves

o market investments to outside investors in lawsuits brought against Epstein by a number of Plaintiffs, represented by the now defunct Law Firm of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt & Adler, P.A. ("RRA"). Some of the lawsuits were transferred to a newly formed firm of Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, PL ("Farmer Jaffe"). E

has carefully considered all of these filings and the entire record in this action, and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. I. BACKGROUND' Scott Rothstein ("Rothstein"), the central figure in a criminal action brought by the United States of America regarding fraudulent activities undertaken by Rothste

idered all of these filings and the entire record in this action, and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. I. BACKGROUND' Scott Rothstein ("Rothstein"), the central figure in a criminal action brought by the United States of America regarding fraudulent activities undertaken by Rothstein while he

on brought by the United States of America regarding fraudulent activities undertaken by Rothstein while he controlled the now bankrupt law firm of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt & Adler, P.A. ("RRA"), was examined in the RRA bankruptcy proceeding and deposed from December 12 ' For additional background, the Court refers the parties to it

ein v. Edwards. Case No. 502009 CA040800XXXXMB AG The Plaintiff Epstein commenced an action on December 7, 2009 seeking damages against Defendants, Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards, and LM,' based on an alleged illegal Ponzi scheme by the Defendants, and the Plaintiff believes others as well, to market inves

, 2009 seeking damages against Defendants, Scott Rothstein, Bradley J. Edwards, and LM,' based on an alleged

o market investments to outside investors in lawsuits brought against Epstein by a number of Plaintiffs, represented by the now defunct Law Firm of Rothstein, Rosenfeldt & Adler, P.A. ("RRA"). Some of the lawsuits were transferred to a newly formed firm of Farmer, Jaffe, Weissing, Edwards, Fistos & Lehrman, PL ("Farmer Jaffe"). E