Epstein Secrets

JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J, EDWARDS, individually. Defendants. IN THE CIRCUIT COURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT IN AND FOR PALM BEACH C

JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, and BRADLEY J, EDWARDS, individu

torney and pursuant to this Court's instruction today, hereby files this Notice of Filing Supplemental Authority. This filing contains the following United States Supreme Court Cases: Minnesota v. Murphy, 465 U.S. 420 (1984) and Hoffman v. United States, 341 U.S. 479 (1951), which were referenced by undersigned at today's

il 22, 2013 VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS The Honorable David Crow Palm Beach County Courthouse 205 • • Highway West Palm Beach, FL 33401 Re: Epstein v. Rothstein. et at Dear Judge Crow: elephone facsimile As discussed in Court this morning, enclosed please find copies of the following two United States Su

ein v. Rothstein. et at Dear Judge Crow: elephone facsimile As discussed in Court this morning, enclosed please find copies of the following two United States Supreme Court cases: Minnesota v. Murphy, 465 U.S. 420 (1984) and Hoffinan v. United States, 341 U.S. 479 (1951). Please feel free to contact my office should an

00 West Palm Beach, FL 33401 WILLIAM J. BERGER ROTHSTEIN ROSENFELDT ADLER 401 East Las Olas Boulevard, Su

ng which itself is protected by Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e) remains non-public, thus effectuating the privacy concerns addressed by the United States Supreme Court in Douglas and other cases. See e.g. Douglas Oil Co. v. Petrol Stops Northwest, 441 U.S. 211, 228-30 (1979). Under Rule 6(e), only a federal court