Epstein Secrets

nt. Edwards Mitt 11 I I.24. She is also a co- defendant with Edwards in Epstein's racketeering and fraud suit against both Edwards and M. as well as Scott Rothstein. Edwards' former law partner. ee infra. Kam incorrectly states that "Imlore recent cases" in this Circuit and District have demoted the showing req

more so in light of Epstein's admission in his lawsuit against M. and others that he that he was "one of M's many `Johns.— See Complaint Epstein v. Rothstein, Edwards & M s, No. 50 2009 CA0 40800 (Cir. Ct., 15th Jud. Cir., Palm Beach Co.. Dec. 7, 2009) at 146(a), pertinent pages annexed as Ex. E to the C

New York Shield Law would then apply. Ste In re Application to Ouash Subpoena to National Broadcasting Co., 79 F.3d 346. 351. 352 (2d Cir. 1996) ("Graco") (applying New York Shield Law to state claims pending in Massachusetts federal court, noting the relevant standards of that law and the federal pr

nt. Edwards Mitt 11 I I.24. She is also a co- defendant with Edwards in Epstein's racketeering and fraud suit against both Edwards and M. as well as Scott Rothstein. Edwards' former law partner. ee infra. 1° Doe incorrectly states that "Imlore recent cases" in this Circuit and District have demoted the showing

ges in his complaint against M. 13 12 The document is available online at http://www.scribd.com/doc/23947743/121009-epstein. "Complaint, Epstein v. Rothstein et al., II 42(h)(i) ("M. testified that she ... worked at various strip clubs; is an admitted prostitute and call girl; has a history of illegal dru

New York Shield Law would then apply. Ste In re Application to Ouash Subpoena to National Broadcasting Co., 79 F.3d 346. 351. 352 (2d Cir. 1996) ("Graco") (applying New York Shield Law to state claims pending in Massachusetts federal court, noting the relevant standards of that law and the federal pr

ifferent litigation in which he himself — not Jane Doc — is a party. Specifically, in January 2010 the managing partner of Edwards' former law firm, Scott Rothstein, pled guilty and was sentenced to 50 years in prison for a massive "Ponzi" scheme in which he defrauded investors of $1.2 billion by convincing the

brought a civil lawsuit against Edwards in Florida state court in which he alleges that Edwards was involved in, or knew or should have known about, Rothstein's Ponzi scheme, and pleads claims against Edwards for fraud and violation of Florida's racketeering statute as well as an abuse of process claim al

poena must show that the information sought is ... unobtainable from other sources") (emphasis added); In re Application to Quash Subpoena to NBC ("Graco"), 79 F.3d 346, 353 (2d Cir. 1996) (rejecting lower court's conclusion that "because the material contained in the out-takes sought by Graco is sole