Epstein Secrets

Rothstein. For example, Epstein alleges generally that "Edwards's... actions constitute a fraud upon Epstein as [Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, and Adler], [Scott] Rothstein and the Litigation Team represented themselves to be acting in good faith and with the best interests of their clients in mind at all times when in

the Rothstein Rosenfeldt Adler law firm ("RRA") where Edwards worked for a short period of time). Epstein appears to allege that Edwards joined and Rothstein in fabricating sexual assault cases against Epstein to "pump" the cases to Ponzi scheme investors. As described by Epstein, investor victims were t

judgment is proper as a matter of law. See Davis v. Hathaway, 408 So. 2d 688, 689 (Fla. 2d Dist. Ct. App. 1982); see also Holl, 191 So. 2d at 43. B. Epstein's Claims Regarding Edwards Have Absolutely No Factual Basis. 5 EFTA00725973 This is not a complicated case for granting summary judgment. To the co

OURT OF THE FIFTEENTH JUDICIAL CIRCUIT, IN AND FOR PALM BEACH COUNTY, FLORIDA CASE NO.: 502009CA040800XXXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually, and L.M., individually, Defendant, RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO EPSTEIN'S MOTION TO REOPEN DISCOVE

XXXMBAG JEFFREY EPSTEIN, Plaintiff, vs. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually, BRADLEY J. EDWARDS, individually,

ated by the Court, that the depositions be needed "solely" as a result of a recent ruling, and the Motion should be denied on those grounds alone. B. Epstein's Prior Counsel Failed to Set L.M. and Jane Doe's Depositions, Despite Requesting and Receiving Dates for Their Depositions in August 2017. 7. The M

y occurred in the course of Edwards' representation of multiple young female victims of Epstein's sexual abuse. While an employee of the now defunct Rothstein, Rosenfeldt, Adler firm and with his current firm, Edwards filed and pursued civil lawsuits Mr. Edwards, an attorney with the FJW firm, is represen

nkruptcy Court. That Motion is set for hearing for January 27, 2011. A Notice of Filing containing that Motion was filed with this Court [DE 1197]. B. Epstein's Attempts to Involve this Court in the State Litigation Despite that summary and protective order motions are pending in state court, Epstein contin