Epstein Secrets

deposition to begin on December 12, 2011, granting a stay to the government. Epstein sought leave of the Bankruptcy Court to take the deposition of Scott Rothstein on December 1, 2011. At that time, Judge Ray denied the Motion without prejudice, because there was no time in the schedule to depose Mr. Rothstein.

y Edwards. The Statement of Undisputed Facts is identical to the one used for Edwards' first Motion for Summary Judgment. EFTA00808026 Epstein v. Rothstein and Edwards Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB/Div. AG Epstein's Response in Opposition to Edwards' MSJ to obtain summary judgment. Third, Edwards has

ed for Edwards' first Motion for Summary Judgment. EFTA00808026 Epstein v. Rothstein and Edwards Case No. 502009CA040800XXXXMB/Div. AG Epstein's Response in Opposition to Edwards' MSJ to obtain summary judgment. Third, Edwards has not demonstrated the absence of material issues of fact. His alleged participation in and/or kno

KR. SCAROLA: May I now to this podium now? JEFFREY EPSTEIN, biaintirs/countor -Defendant, vs 4 THE CO1RT: Sure. 'at. SCAROLA: Thank you, sir. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually; • Your 110nOr, have we decided what notions were BRADLEY EDWARDS, individually, , going to hoar? boranciants/countor -Plaintiffs

ng CO your Honor that 12 during a very CUTUICUOUSI period of CIAO these would I) the first notice we got of an Intent CO attempt. to to be the Rothstein fines, erployee. 14 use chose documents was March S. The first notice 14 KR. SMOLA: Yes, air. Let ne go through IS wo got of an intent CO attem

ch 8th, 2018 14 Notice of Service of Unredacted Appendix in TIME: 1:30 p.m. - 4:50 p.m. PLACE 205 N. Dixie Highway, Room 10D IS Support -- or Response in Opposition to Edwards' Most Pain Beach, Florida BEFORE: Donald Hafolo, Presiding Judge 1, Second Supplenental Motion in Limit* addressing )7 Scope of Admissible Evid

KR. SCAROLA: May I now to this podium now? JEFFREY EPSTEIN, biaintirs/countor -Defendant, vs 4 THE CWRT: Sure. 'at. SCAROLA: Thank you, sir. SCOTT ROTHSTEIN, individually; • Your Honor, have we wowed what notions were BRADLEY EDWARDS, individually, boranciants/countor -Plaintiffs. , 10 going to hoa

ng CO your Honor that 12 during a very CUTUICUOUSI period of CIAO these would I) the first notice we got of an Intent CO attempt. to to be the Rothstein fines, erployee. 14 use chose documents was March S. The first notice 14 KR. SMOLA: Yes, air. Let ne go through IS wo got of an intent CO attem

ch 8th, 2018 )4 Notice of Service of Unredacted Appendix in TIME: 1:30 p.m. - 4:50 p.m. PLACE 205 N. Dixie Highway, Roon IOD IS Support -- or Response in Opposition to Edwards' Most Pain Beach, Florida BEFORE: Donald Natal., Presiding Judge I, Second Supplenental Motion in Limine addressing J7 Scope of Admissible Evid

KR. LINK: I understand. Your Honor, may I respected coach and former coach of the Heat -- a have one ninute to confer with appellate counsel to Scott Rothstein wan sitting on thin stuff. That's 7 ado sure there's nothing I need to do to preserve i not what happened hero. That's the point that I'm • this

an agreement. And 19 THE COUR?: I nay have font you. ?he 74,000 in our agreement, your court order says no 20 pages wore self-generated from the Rothstein firm: additional exhibits unless the parties agree. In 21 MR. LINK: Yes. And delivered by the trustee the pretrial stip Kr. scarola and I agree

Lamine Addressing Scope of Admissible Evidence, and of course in that sane vein roster'. Notice of Service of Unredacted Appendix in Surport -- or Response in Opposition to Edwards' Second Supplemental Motion in Ursine addressing Scope of Admissible Evidence. NR. SCARINA: Your Honor, there are actually nultiple submissions to